Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:24:36.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Highly-Efficient Solution-Processed Organic Light Emitting Diodes with Blend V2O5-PEDOT:PSS Hole-Injection/Hole-Transport Layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2019

Rohit Ashok Kumar Yadav ,
Mangey Ram Nagar ,
Deepak Kumar Dubey ,
Sujith Sudheendran Swayamprabha  and
Jwo-Huei Jou
Rohit Ashok Kumar Yadav
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
Mangey Ram Nagar
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
Deepak Kumar Dubey
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
Sujith Sudheendran Swayamprabha
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
Jwo-Huei Jou*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
*
*(Email: jjou@mx.nthu.edu.tw)
Get access

Abstract

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) have attracted huge concern because of their intrinsic characteristics and ability to reach the pinnacle in the field of high-quality flat-panel displays and energy-efficient solid-state lighting. High-efficiency is always a key crux for OLED devices being energy-saving and longer life-span. OLEDs have encountered enormous difficulties in meeting the requirements for large-sized devices due to a major limitation in vacuum thermal evaporation technology. In multilayered OLED devices, the characteristics of the charge injection/transport layer is a crucial factor for the operating-voltage, power-efficiency and stability of the device. Transition metal oxides have shown great potential owing to their wide range of possible energy level alignments, balanced charge injection, and improvement of carrier mobilities. In this study, we report a solution-processed blend V2O5-PEDOT:PSS hole-injection/hole-transport layer (HIL/HTL) for efficient orange phosphorescent OLEDs. The electroluminescent characteristics of blend V2O5-PEDOT:PSS based devices were studied with the structure ITO/V2O5-PEDOT:PSS/CBP:Ir(2-phq)3/TPBi/LiF/Al. The V2O5-PEDOT:PSS based OLEDs displayed relatively higher device performance and low roll-off than that of the counter PEDOT:PSS device in terms of a maximum luminance of 17,670 cd m-2, power efficiency of 19.4 lm W-1, external quantum efficiency of 8.7%, and more importantly, low turn-on voltage. These results demonstrate an alternative approach based on metal oxide/organic blend HIL/HTL as a substitute of PEDOT:PSS for high-efficiency solution process OLEDs.

Keywords

organicblenddevicesmicroelectronics
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 31-32: Electronics and Photonics , 2019 , pp. 1779 - 1786
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dubey, D. K., Shahoo, S., Wang, C. W. and Jou, J. H., Organic Electronics 69, 232 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jou, J. H., Sahoo, S., Dubey, D. K., Yadav, R. A. K., Sujith, S. S. and Chavhan, S. D., J. Mater. Chem. C 6, 11492 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S., An, C. C., Sahoo, S., Griniene, R., Volyniuk, D., Grazulevicius, J. V., Grigalevicius, S. and Jou, J. H., J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 9854 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jou, J. H., Kumar, S., Agrawal, A., Lia, T. H. and Sahoo, S., J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 2974 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, S., Liu, S., Chen, Y. and So, F., J. of Photonics for Energy 5, 057611 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavhan, S. D., Ou, T. H., Jiang, M. R., Wang, C. W. and Jou, J. H., J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 18836 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubey, D. K., Yadav, R. A. K., Tavgeniene, D., Grigalevicius, S. and Jou, J. H., Thin Solid Films 660, 956 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilberberg, K., Meyer, J. and Riedl, T., J. Mater. Chem. C 1, 4796 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, F., Cheng, Y. J., Zhang, Y., Liu, M. S. and Jen, A. K. Y., J. Mater. Chem. 18, 4495 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Kanwat, A., Kim, H. M. and Jang, J., Phys. Status Solidi A 212, 640 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Wang, S., Sun, X. and Chen, S., J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 817 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawhecker, K. E. and Kumar, S. K., Macromolecules 34, 4669 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, R., Zachariah, S. and Balasubramanian, K., Adv. Sci. Eng. Med. 8, 181 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jou, J. H., Weng, J. W., Chavhan, S. D., Yadav, R. A. K. and Liang, T. W., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 454002 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar