Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:17:47.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nickel nano-dot arrays on silicon substrate fabrication and surface charge distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2020

Anupam K.C.*
Affiliation:
Materials Science, Engineering and Commercialization Program (MSEC), Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666, United States.
Garrett Merrion
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas,78666, United States.
*
Get access

Abstract

We report a simple and feasible technique for the formation of well-distributed nickel nanodot arrays on both oxidized and unoxidized silicon substrate by a conventional annealing process. The shape and distribution of nickel nanodots were maintained by adjusting annealing temperature, time and the SiO2 buffer layer thickness in between nickel film and the silicon substrate. The diffusion of nickel into the silicon is significantly reduced when the nickel film on the oxidized silicon substrate is annealed at high temperature. From this conventional annealing technique, we achieve a maximum nickel nanodots density up to (7.94±1.92) nanodot counts/µm2 on the oxidized silicon substrate with a well-defined spherical shape by adjusting the thickness of nickel film as well as buffer SiO2 layer. In the next experiment, the surface charge distribution on the nickel nanodot arrays were characterized through the Kelvin probe force microscope (KPFM) on tapping mode. It is found that the nickel nanodots can store and release the electric charges under an applied bias voltage.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Rana, F., Tiwari, S., and Welser, J. J., Superlattices Microstruct. 23, 757 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oguro, T., Koyama, H., Ozaki, T. and Koshida, N., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 1407, 81 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H., Kumar, D., Kvit, A., Tiwari, A., and Narayan, J., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. - Proc. 755, 153 (2003).Google Scholar
Kuang, X., Tian, J., Guo, H., Hou, Y., Zhang, H., and Liu, T., Mater. Technol. 52, 119 (2018).Google Scholar
Lin, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,073108, 1 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishihara, R., Makihara, K., Kawaguchi, Y., Ikeda, M., Murakami, H., Higashi, S., and Miyazaki, S., Mater. Sci. Forum 561–565, 1213 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, G. R., Kuo, H. C., Lin, H. S., and Kao, C. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 143102 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H., Lee, W., Lee, J. H., and Yoon, D. S., J. Nanomater. 2016, 21 (2016).Google Scholar
Nishihara, R., Makihara, K., Kawaguchi, Y., Ikeda, M., Murakami, H., Higashi, S., and Miyazaki, S., Mater. Sci. Forum. 561–565, 1213 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar