Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:33:12.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OLED Manufacturing on Flexible Substrates Towards Roll-to-Roll

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2019

Dongxiang Wang
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Organic Electronics, Electron Beam and Plasma Technology (FEP), Winterbergstr. 28, 01277Dresden, Germany
Jacqueline Hauptmann
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Organic Electronics, Electron Beam and Plasma Technology (FEP), Winterbergstr. 28, 01277Dresden, Germany
Christian May*
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Organic Electronics, Electron Beam and Plasma Technology (FEP), Winterbergstr. 28, 01277Dresden, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Large area lighting OLEDs manufactured in a Roll-to-Roll (R2R) fashion enable the well-longed production capability with considerably high throughput based on flexible substrates, hence largely reduced OLED manufacturing cost. This paper will outline the present status of R2R OLED fabrication on ultra-thin glass with the focus on transparent OLED devices and how to perform segmentation by printing of silver- and dielectric pastes. Ultra-thin glass (UTG) is laminated on a PET film to avoid fabrication interruptions when glass cracks occur during the Roll-to-Roll process. The R2R fabricated flexible OLEDs also show key-values comparable to conventional OLEDs fabricated on small rigid glass in lab-scale.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deus, C., Richter, J., Gross, H., Mogck, S., May, C., Wanski, T. in R2R processing of flexible small molecule OLEDs for lighting applications, (8th Int. Conf. on Coatings on Glass and Plastics Proc., Braunschweig, Germany, 2010) pp. 117-122.Google Scholar
Meerheim, R., Lussem, B., Leo, K., Proc. IEEE 97, 16061626 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, M., Leo, K., Zhou, X., Huang, J.S., Hofmann, M., Werner, A., Blochwitz-Nimoth, J., Org. Electron. 4, 89103 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, G., Bulović, V., Burrows, P.E., Forrest, S.R., Thompson, M.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2606 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, S., Meiss, J., Müller-Meskamp, L., Leo, K., Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 438443 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, S., Müller-Meskamp, L., Leo, K., Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 66686676 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C., Zhao, D., Gu, D., Kim, H., Ling, T., Wu, Y.-K.R., Guo, L.J., Adv. Mater. 26, 5696-5701 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, S., Glaesemann, S., and Li, X., Appl. Phys. A 116, 403 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, A., Salcedo, E., Berndt, A., Choi, D., Ryu, J.E., Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 1, 193198 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar