Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:20:46.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasmonic-Enhancement of the Electro-Oxidation of Ethanol in Alkaline Media with Au-Fe2O3 Thin Film, Embedded, Sandwich and Surface Configurations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2017

Joshua P. McClure*
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Kyle N. Grew
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Naresh C. Das
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Deryn Chu
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
David Baker
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Nicholas Strnad
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Eric Gobrogge
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, Adelphi, MD, 2800 Powder Mill Road, Adelphi, MD 20783, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

This paper highlights experimental and theoretical efforts dedicated to developing plasmonic-enhanced electrodes for the photo-electrochemical ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) at room temperature in alkaline media. However, decoupling the electrocatalytic dark response from the plasmon-enhanced improvement presents a difficult challenge. To understand the plasmonic-enhancement of the photo-electrochemical EOR, multiple Au-Fe2O3 were fabricated and evaluated in parallel with discrete dipole approximation (DDA) modeling. Different Au-Fe2O3 were synthesized with Au nanoparticles located at variable positions within and/or on the Fe2O3 layer(s). The configurations investigated include thin film, embedded, surface and sandwich layered electrodes to facilitate optimal electrode design considerations for plasmonic-enhancement. The design strategies and configurations were guided by DDA simulations to assess absorption, scattering, and near-field enhancements within or near the semiconductor band edge, as well as the solution/electrode interface. For the different Fe2O3 loadings and Au nanoparticle sizes/distributions considered, it is determined that the Au-Fe2O3 surface configurations significantly enhanced the EOR in terms of a large positive current density enhancement, an increased photo-voltage and a lower onset potential relative to the other electrode designs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Spendelow, J.S. and Wieckowski, A., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9 (21), 26542675 (2007).Google Scholar
He, Q., Shyam, B., Macounova, K., Krtil, P., Ramaker, D. and Mukerjee, S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134 (20), 86558661 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, R., Tran, D.T., McClure, J.P. and Chu, D., ACS Catal., 4 (8), 25772586 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Cushing, S. K., Zheng, P., Meng, F., Chu, D. and Wu, N., Nat. Commun. 4, 2651 (2013).Google Scholar
Hung, W.H., Aykol, M., Valley, D., Hou, W. and Cronin, S.B., Nano Lett. 10 (4), 13141318 (2010).Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S., Libisch, F., Large, N., Neumann, O., Brown, L.V., Cheng, J., Lassiter, J. B., Carter, E.A., Norlander, P. and Halas, N. J., Nano Lett. 13 (1), 240247 (2013).Google Scholar
Thomann, I., Pinaud, B.A., Chen, Z., Clemens, B.M., Jaramillo, T.F. and Brongersma, M.L., Nano Lett. 11 (8) 34403446 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linic, S., Christopher, P., Xin, H., Marimuthu, A., Acc. Chem. Res. 46 (8), 18901899 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopher, P., Xin, H. and Linic, S., Nat. Chem. 3, 467 (2011).Google Scholar
Boerigter, C., Campana, R., Morabito, M. and Linic, S., Nat. Commun. 7, 10545 (2016).Google Scholar
Ng, C., Cadusch, J. J., Dligatch, S., Roberts, A., Davis, T. J., Mulvaney, P. and Gomez, D. E., ACS Nano, 10(4), 47044711 (2016).Google Scholar
Draine, B.T., Flatau, P.J., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11, 1491 (1994); J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 25, 2593, (2008); Opt. Express, 20, 1247(2012)Google Scholar
Shinde, P.S., Choi, S.H., Kim, Y., Ryu, J. and Jang, J.S., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 2495 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar