Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:34:13.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Raman Spectroscopy Application to Characterize EVA after UV Exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2016

Sari Katz*
Affiliation:
On Sabbatical leave from Soreq NRC, Yavne 81800, Israel.
Aaron Urbas
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8615, U.S.A.
Stephanie S. Watson
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8615, U.S.A.
Xiaohong Gu
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8615, U.S.A.
*
Get access

Abstract

Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) is the most commonly used photovoltaic (PV) encapsulant material. As such, it is exposed to UV, thermal cycles, temperature gradients between the glass side and the silicon wafer side, and moisture ingress. The combined effect of all these may lead to different physical and chemical changes of EVA including polymer chain alignment, crystallinity, and crosslinking density, as well as the mechanical stresses resulting from coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and aging, thus, reducing the adhesion of EVA and eventually lead to failure of the encapsulation. Measuring the effects of UV exposure on EVA can help in understanding the failure mechanism of PV modules. In this work, we suggest a novel and non-destructive way to measure EVA degradation after UV exposure by using Raman spectroscopy (RS). Samples were exposed to NIST SPHERE with UV irradiation, moisture, and elevated temperatures. The physical and chemical changes as well as the internal stresses were monitored by RS, and the intensities of the corresponding Raman peaks ratio were analyzed. The results have indicated that Raman scattering is a sensitive tool to study EVA encapsulant degradation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Czanderna, A.W. and Pern, F.J., Sol Energ Mat Sol C, 1996. 43(2): p. 101181.Google Scholar
Abrusci, C., et al. , J Appl Polym Sci. 126(5): p. 16641675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, X. et al. , in Proc. SPIE 8825. San Diago, CA.Google Scholar
Dong, X., in Atlas/CEI Solar Energy Durability November 19-20, 2014: Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, M., et al. , Vib Spectrosc, 1997. 14(2): p. 253259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernev, B.S., Hirschl, C., and Eder, G.C., Appl Spectrosc, 2013. 67(11): p. 12961301.Google Scholar
Hirschl, C., et al. , Sol Energ Mat Sol C, 2013. 116(0): p. 203218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, A.M., Vaughan, A.S., and Wyeth, P., J Raman Spectrosc, 2005. 36(3): p. 185191.Google Scholar
Pern, F.J., Sol Energ Mat Sol C, 1996. 41/42(0): p. 587615.Google Scholar
Kerr, T., Duncan, K., and Myers, L., 2013. 102: p. 103113.Google Scholar
Peike, C. et al. , Sol Energ Mat Sol C, 2011. 95(7): p. 16861693.Google Scholar
Peike, C. et al. , in SPIE 8472. 2012. San Diago, CA.Google Scholar
Szep, A., et al. , Polym Degrad Stabil, 2006. 91(3): p. 593599.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Cabello, J.C., et al. , Polymer, 1995. 36(22): p. 42334238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigeon, M., Prud'homme, R.E., and Pezolet, M., Macromolecules, 1991. 24(20): p. 56875694.Google Scholar
Lourie, O. and Wagner, H.D., J Mater Res, 1998. 13(09): p. 24182422.Google Scholar
Chin, J., et al. , Rev Sci Instrum, 2004. 75(11): p. 49514959.Google Scholar
Fasce, L., et al. , Macromol Symp, 2007. 247(1): p. 271281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar