Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:02:14.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Do Copolymer Compatibilizers Really Work?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Most pairs of chemically different homopolymers of any useful molecular weight are thermodynamically immiscible. This is because any tiny repulsive interaction per monomer, multiplied by the large number of monomers in a typical polymer, overwhelms entropy of mixing (of the order of kBT per molecule where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T the temperature). Nonetheless blends of immiscible pairs of homopolymers are industrially ubiquitous. Two broad categories of such materials are rubber-toughened plastics and stiffened elastomers. Both are fine dispersions of one polymer in another, with the desirable properties of the resulting material (e.g., stiffness-toughness balance) depending crucially on its composite structure and the mechanical contrast between the two components (e.g., difference in moduli).

Typically a fine dispersion, consisting of submicron particles, is necessary for good final properties. Also necessary is a strong interfacial bond between the particles and the matrix so that the resulting material does not fail at these interfaces. A typical volume fraction of the suspended component is perhaps 20–30%. Such polymer blends are prepared by two time-honored techniques (ancient, really, if one considers their antecedents in cookery): stirring and the use of polymeric surfactants—copolymers. The copolymers can be synthesized beforehand and added to a mixer where the components are stirred, but more often they are produced from the homopolymers during stirring by a grafting reaction, which somehow joins the two dissimilar homopolymers to form some sort of block copolymer.

Type
Theory and Simulation of Polymers at Interfaces
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.de Gennes, P.G., Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1979).Google Scholar
2.Paul, D.R. and Newman, S., eds., Polymer Blends, vol. 2 (Academic Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
3.Kleintjens, L.A. and Lemstra, P.J., eds., Integration of Fundamental Polymer Science and Technology (Elsevier, London, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Taylor, G.I., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 138 (1932) p. 41; G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 146 (1934) p. 501.Google Scholar
5.Scott, C.E. and Macosko, C.W., Polymer 35 (1994) p. 5422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sundararaj, U. and Macosko, C.W., Macromolecules 28 (1995) p. 2647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Tan, N.C. Beck, Tai, S-K., and Briber, R.M., Polymer 37 (1996) p. 3509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. For a more complete account of the theoretical arguments and calculations of this paper, see Milner, S.T. and Xi, H., J. Rheol. 40 (1996) p. 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Rallison, J.M., Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16 (1984) p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Stone, H.A., Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26 (1994) p. 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. See Friedlander, S.K., Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
12.Russel, W.B., Saville, D.A., and Schowalter, W.R., Colloidal Dispersions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. For a review see Kramer, E.J., Norton, L.J., Dai, C-A., Sha, Y., and Hui, C-Y., Faraday Society Discuss. 98 (1994) p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar