Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:59:14.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concerning the global-scale introduction of renewable energies: Technical and economic challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2014

David Faiman
David Faiman*
Affiliation:
A. Yersin Department of Solar Energy and Environmental Physics, Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus 84990, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The paper argues that solar photovoltaic or wind systems would need to be implemented at a rate of hundreds of gigawatts each year to obviate the continuing worldwide growth of fossil-fueled electricity generation. It suggests that an electricity consumption tax could constitute a sustainable mechanism for funding such an endeavor.

It is observed that the atmospheric content of carbon dioxide rose by approximately 16 Gt in 2012. A non-negligible contribution to this increase must surely have come from the 35 Gt of CO2 emitted by fossil fuel consumption that year, of which 11 Gt came from fossil-fueled electricity generation (FFEG). Yet, new FFEG plants continue to be built. Although it is questionable whether economic forces would permit a halt to the construction of such plants, it is argued that, from the perspectives of technology, manufacturing capability, land availability, and cost, it could be feasible to use solar photovoltaic and wind plants to provide for the annual increase in the worldwide need for electricity. However, the required capital expenditure cost of approximately US$ 0.5 trillion per year might be difficult to raise by conventional methods for funding renewable energy plants. A number of alternative funding mechanisms are examined. Among them, an electricity consumption tax is found to be capable of providing an assured amount of regular funding on this scale. In North America and Europe, such a tax would add approximately 1 US¢/kWh to present electricity tariffs. In other regions, it would amount to an addition of 2–5 US¢/kWh.

Keywords

environmentenergyphotovoltaics
Type
Review
Information
MRS Energy & Sustainability , Volume 1 , 2014 , E3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES:

Fjaer, E., Holt, R.M., Horsrud, P., Raaen, A.M., and Risnes, R.: Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam and Oxford, 2008; pp. 369–390, Chapter 11.Google Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory <ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends/co2_annmean_mlo.txt> (consulted November 2013).+(consulted+November+2013).>Google Scholar
Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J., and Ephraums, J.J. ed.; Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1990 and various later editions.Google Scholar
BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2013. <http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/statistical-review-of-world-energy-2013.html> (consulted November 2013).+(consulted+November+2013).>Google Scholar
Moore, L.M. and Post, H.N.: Five years of operating experience at a large, utility-scale photovoltaic generating plant. Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. 16, 249 (2008).Google Scholar
Leloux, J., Narvarte, L., and Trebosc, D.: Review of the performance of residential PV systems in France. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 16, 1369–1376 (2012). (Note: The average performance of the systems discussed in this reference is 1,163 kWh y-1 kW-1, compared to the 1,398 kWh y-1 kW-1 of the residential systems mentioned en passent in Arizona mentioned in Ref. [5]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccard, N.: Capacity factors of wind power: Realized values vs. estimates. Energy Policy 37, 2679–2688 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, S., Campbell, C., Denholm, P., Margolis, R., and Heath, G.: Land-use Requirements for Solar Power Plants in the United States; National Renewable Laboratory report NREL/TP-6A20-56290, June 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denholm, P., Hand, M., Jackson, M., and Ong, S.: Land-use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States; National Renewable Laboratory report NREL/TP-6A2-45834, August 2009.Google Scholar
CIA World Factbook <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/textversion.html> (consulted November 2013).+(consulted+November+2013).>Google Scholar
US Dept. of Transportation. Federal Highway Administrationhttp://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2008/hm33.cfm (consulted November 2013).Google Scholar
Sicheng, W.: Personal communication, July 2013.Google Scholar
Sharma, N.K., Tiwari, P.K., and Sood, Y.R.: Solar energy in India: Strategies, policies, perspectives and future potential. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 16, 933–941 (2012).Google Scholar
Sawyer, S., Pillai, G.M., and Kymel, R. eds.: India Wind Energy Outlook 2012. Global Wind Energy Council, November 2012. www.gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/India-Wind-Energy-Outlook-2012.pdf (consulted 27/4/14).Google Scholar
Ushiyama, I.: Wind power development in Japan. Ashikaga Inst. of Technology, Japan Wind Energy Association, March 2012. <jref.or.jp/images/pdf/20120309/9March_Revision2012_session2_ushiyama.pdf> (consulted 27/4/14).Google Scholar
Tidball, R., Bluestein, J., Rodriguez, N., and Knoke, S.: Cost and Performance Assumptions for Modeling Electricity Generation Technologies; National Renewable Energy Laboratory report NREL/SR-6A20-48595, November 2010.Google Scholar
Feldman, D., Barbose, G., Margolis, R., Wiser, R., Darghouth, N., and Goodrich, A.: Photovoltaic (PV) pricing trends: Historical, recent, and near-term projections. US Dept. of Energy report DOE/GO-102012-3839, November 2012.Google Scholar
Annual Energy Outlook 2014 – Early Release Overview. <http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/assumptions/pdf/table8_2_2014er.pdf> (consulted 24.4.14).+(consulted+24.4.14).>Google Scholar
Morjaria, M. and Anichkov, D.: “Grid-Friendly” Utility-Scale PV Plants. [First Solar White Paper: Gridintegration_WP_NA_13AUG13]. (2013).Google Scholar
Faiman, D., Raviv, D., and Rosenstreich, R.: Using solar energy to arrest the increasing rate of fossil-fuel consumption: The southwestern states of the USA as case studies. Energy Policy 35, 567–576 (2007).Google Scholar
Priddle, R. ed.: World Energy Outlook 2011. OECD/IEA, 2011; pp. 507–540. Available as a free download fromhttp://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2011_WEB.pdf.Google Scholar
Solomon, A.A., Faiman, D., and Meron, G.: Properties and uses of storage for enhancing the grid penetration of very large photovoltaic systems. Energy Policy 38, 5208–5222 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denholm, P. and Margolis, R.M.: Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in traditional electric power systems. Energy Policy 35, 2852–2861 (2007).Google Scholar
Solomon, A.A., Faiman, D., and Meron, G.: An energy-based evaluation of the matching possibilities of very large photovoltaic plants to the electricity grid: Israel as a case study. Energy Policy 38, 5457–5468 (2010).Google Scholar
Solomon, A.A., Faiman, D., and Meron, G.: Appropriate storage for high-penetration grid-connected photovoltaic plants. Energy Policy 40, 335–344 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar