Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T23:57:54.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conduction-Band-Offset Rule Governing J-V Distortion in CdS/CI(G)S Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

A. Kanevce ,
M. Gloeckler ,
A.O. Pudov  and
J.R. Sites
A. Kanevce
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523,USA
M. Gloeckler
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523,USA
A.O. Pudov
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523,USA
J.R. Sites
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523,USA
Get access

Abstract

A type-I (“spike”) conduction-band offset (CBO) greater than a few tenths of an eV at the n/p interface of a solar cell can lead to significant distortion of the current-voltage (J-V) curve. Such distortion has been observed in CdS/CIS cells, low-gallium CdS/CIGS cells, and CIGS cells with alternative windows that increase the CBO. The basic feature is reduced current collection in forward bias. The distortion is mitigated by photoconductivity in the CdS or other window layer, and it is therefore more severe if the illumination contains no photons with energies greater than the band gap of the window layer. The device-physics analysis of such distortion is numerical simulation incorporating a three-layer [TCO/CdS/CI(G)S] approximation for the solar cell. The parameters that influence the barrier height, and hence the distortion, are the magnitude of the CBO, the doping of the p- and n- layers, the defect density of the CdS, and the thicknesses of the CdS and TCO layers. The key value, however, is the energy difference between the quasi-Fermi level for electrons and the conduction band at the CdS/CIS interface. Thermionic emission across the interface will limit the current collection, if the difference exceeds approximately 0.48 eV at 300 K and one-sun illumination. This constraint is consistent with experiment, and strategies to satisfy the 0.48-eV rule when designing solar cells are enumerated.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 865: Symposium F – Thin-Film Compound Semiconductor Photovoltaics , 2005 , F5.32
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Contreras, M.A., Ramanathan, K., AbuShama, J., Hasoon, F., Young, D. L., Egaas, B. and Noufi, R.; Prog. Photovoltaics (in press).Google Scholar
2 Contreras, M.A., Nakada, T., Hongo, M., Pudov, A.O., and Sites, J.R., Proc. 3rd World Conf. of Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, (2003), pp. 570–573.Google Scholar
3 Pudov, A.O., Sites, J. R., Nakada, T., and Schock, H.W., Thin Solid Films (in press).Google Scholar
4 Pudov, A.O., Hasoon, F. S., Kanevce, A., Al-Thani, H.A., Sites, J.R., J. of Appl. Phys. 97 064901 (2005).Google Scholar
5 Sze, S.M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, (John Wiley & Sons, 1981) Eq. (16) p. 255.Google Scholar
6 Gloeckler, M., Fahrenbruch, A.L., and Sites, J.R., in Proc. World Conf. on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (2003), pp. 491–494.Google Scholar
7 Niemegeers, A., Burgelman, M., and Vos, A. De, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 843 (1995).Google Scholar
8 Eisgruber, I.L., Granata, J.E., Sites, J.R., Hou, J., and Kessler, J., Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. Cells, 53, 367 (1998).Google Scholar
9 Wei, S. H., Zhang, S.B., Zunger, A., Applied Physics Letters 72, 3199 (1998).Google Scholar