Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:31:42.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Oxygen Permeation Kinetics in A Ceramic Membrane with The Composition SrFeCo0.5O3.25-δ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Kim
Affiliation:
University of Houston, Department of Chemistry, Houston, TX 77204–5641.
Y. L. Yang
Affiliation:
University of Houston, Department of Chemistry, Houston, TX 77204–5641.
R. Christoffersen
Affiliation:
University of Houston, Department of Chemistry, Houston, TX 77204–5641.
A. J. Jacobson
Affiliation:
University of Houston, Department of Chemistry, Houston, TX 77204–5641.
Get access

Abstract

The oxygen permeation through an oxide membrane with bulk composition SrFeCo0.5O3.25-δ has been measured as a function of both oxygen partial pressure and temperature. The results of the pressure dependence of the permeation indicate that the oxygen transport in this membrane is dependent primarily on the bulk diffusion rate. Although the permeation experiments were carried out at temperatures within, or very close to, the range where SrFeCo0.5O3.25-δ is stable as a pure single phase, the membrane was found to consist of SrFe1.5-xO3.25-δ(x = ∼0.42) together with fractions of Sr(Co,Fe)O3-δ perovskite and Co-Fe oxide that formed as stable phases during densification of the membrane at high temperature (1090°C). These additional phases persisted in the membrane during the permeation measurements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Balachandran, U., Dusek, J. T., Mieville, R. L., Poeppel, R. B., Kleefisch, M. S., Pei, S., Kobylinski, T. P., Udovich, C. A., and Bose, A. C., (1995) Applied Catalysis A: General, v. 133, p. 1929, (1995).10.1016/0926-860X(95)00159-XGoogle Scholar
2. Pei, S., Kleefisch, M. S., Kobylinski, T. P., Faber, J., Udovich, C. A., Zhang-McCoy, V., Dabrowski, U., Balachandran, U., Mieville, R. L., and Poeppel, R. B., Catalysis Letters, v. 30, p. 201212 (1995)10.1007/BF00813686Google Scholar
3. Ma, B., Balachandran, U., Park, J.-H., and Segre, C.U., Solid State Ionics, 83, 65 (1996).10.1016/0167-2738(95)00227-8Google Scholar
4. Ma, B. and Balachandran, U., Solid State Ionics, 100, pp. 5362 (1997)10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00342-1Google Scholar
5. Yoshiasa, A., Ueno, K., Kanamaru, F. and Horiuchi, H., Mat. Res. Bull., 21, pp. 175181 (1986).10.1016/0025-5408(86)90204-7Google Scholar
6. Lee, T.H., Yang, Y.L., Jacobson, A.J., Abeles, B. and Zhou, M., Solid State Ionics, 100, 77 (1997)10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00257-9Google Scholar
7. Kim, S. Yang, Y.L., Jacobson, A.J. and Abeles, B., Solid State Ionics, in press.Google Scholar
8. Kim, S., Yang, Y.L., Jacobson, A.J. and Abeles, B., submitted to Solid State Ionics Proc, Hawaii, USA, 1997.Google Scholar
9. Guggilla, S. and Manthiram, A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 144, pp. L120L122 (1997).10.1149/1.1837631Google Scholar