Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:38:52.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disposability of the UK's Intermediate Level Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Paul K. Abraitis
Affiliation:
Environment Agency, Nuclear Waste Assessment Team, Ghyll Mount, Gillan Way, Penrith, Cumbria, CA11 9BP
Glyn Davies
Affiliation:
Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, Nuclear Directorate, Redgrave Court, Merton Road, Bootle, Merseyside, L20 7HS
Get access

Abstract

The UK's intermediate level waste (ILW) comprises a range of waste types, which vary widely in terms of physical and chemical properties, radionuclide content (including fissile) and half-life. ILW needs to be conditioned in such a way as to provide confidence that a future disposal facility for such wastes will be able to meet or exceed the basic long-term safety and environmental protection standards. The reactive properties and heterogeneous nature of certain ILW can present waste immobilisation challenges and, depending on the waste conditioning process that is adopted, may ultimately preclude the production of truly passive wasteforms. Of considerable interest is the extent of long-term containment likely to be afforded by the waste container, the wasteform and any engineered barriers within the disposal system. A regulatory view of the current uncertainties is provided and areas where further understanding would be beneficial are identified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Defra, DTI and the Devolved Administrations (2007). Policy for the Long Term Management of Solid Low Level Radioactive Waste in the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
[2] “Review of Radioactive Waste Management Policy: Final Conclusions”, Cm2919, HMSO, July 1995.Google Scholar
[3] Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency and Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Conditioning of intermediate level radioactive waste on nuclear licensed sites, Guidance to Industry, 2005.Google Scholar
[4] Defra and Nirex (2006). Radioactive Waste in the UK: Main Report. DEFRA Report DEFRA/RAS/05.002, Nirex Report N/090.Google Scholar
[5] Nirex (2005). The Viability of a Phased Geological Repository Concept for the Longterm management of the UK's Radioactive Waste. Nirex Report N/122.Google Scholar
[6] Nirex (2005). Waste Package Specification and Guidance Documentation. Volume 1 – Specification. Nirex Report N/104.Google Scholar
[7] Environment Agency (2005). Review of Nirex Report: ‘The Viability of a Phased Geological Repository Concept for the Long-term Management of the UK's Radioactive Waste’. NWAT/Nirex/05/003 (Version 3.1).Google Scholar
[8] Fairhall, G. A. and Palmer, J. D., ‘The Encapsulation of Magnox Swarf in Cement in the United Kingdom’, Cem. Concr. Res. (1992), 22, p. 293–298.Google Scholar
[9] Abraitis, P. K. and Baker, A. J., ‘Regulatory Oversight of the Conditioning of UK Intermediate Level Radioactive Wastes: Post-Closure Criticality Safety Aspects’, Proceedings of ICEM'05, Glasgow, 2005.Google Scholar
[10] Hicks, T. W. and Green, T. H., (1999). A Review of the Treatment of Criticality in Post-Closure Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal. The Environment Agency Research and Development Technical Report No. P222.Google Scholar
[11] Environment Agency (2005). NWAT Review of Nirex's Approach to the Setting of Fissile Limits for Waste Packages and Assessment of Possible Post-closure Criticality Events. NWAT/Nirex/04/002 (Version 1.3).Google Scholar
[12] Environment Agency, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency and Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland (1997). Radioactive Substances Act 1993 – Disposal Facilities on Land for Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Wastes: Guidance on Requirements for Authorisation. Bristol: Environment Agency.Google Scholar
[13] Nirex (2006). C-14: How we are addressing the issues. Nirex Technical Note.Google Scholar
[14] Nirex (2006). Package Longevity: Current Status and Route Map. Nirex Technical Note.Google Scholar
[15] Environment Agency (2005). Reworking Intermediate Level Waste. Science Report SC040047.Google Scholar