Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:39:16.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Strain Rate and Prestraining on Tensile Behavior of Duplex Gamma Titanium Aluminides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

D. S. Shih
Affiliation:
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, MC 111 1041, P. O. Box 516, St. Louis, MO 63166-0516
D. S. Schwartz
Affiliation:
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, MC 111 1041, P. O. Box 516, St. Louis, MO 63166-0516
J. E. O'Neal
Affiliation:
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, MC 111 1041, P. O. Box 516, St. Louis, MO 63166-0516
Get access

Abstract

The effects of strain rate and prestraining on tensile behavior of two-phase (γ+α2) titanium aluminides at 20 and 730°C have been investigated. At 20°C the elongation remains at about 1.4% as the strain rate increases from 5ȕ10−5 to 5ȕ10−2 s−1 and it drops to nearly zero at 5ȕ10−1s−1. At 730°C ( i.e.above DBTT) the plastic strain is about 13% when tested at 5ȕ10−5s−1, while it reduces significantly to less than 3% at 5ȕ10−4 and 5ȕ10−2 s−1. Again, the elongation is about zero at the highest strain rate tested, 5ȕ10−1 s−1. Regardless of the strain rate, fracture by an intergranular mode of the primary equiaxed γ appears to increasingly dominate as temperature changes from 20 to 730°C. Introduction of prior plastic deformation by prestraining beyond yielding at 945°C obviously increases the 20°C yield stress, however, with little influence on ductility. Transmission electron microscopy reveals that a number of dislocation loops are produced during prestraining. These loops are generally immobile resulting in the observed increase of flow stress and unchanged ductility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Huang, S-C. and Shih, D.S., in Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys, edited by Kim, Y-W. and Boyer, R.R., TMS, p. 105 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Shih, D.S., Huang, S-C., Scarr, G.K., Jang, H. and Chesnutt, J.C., in Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys, edited by Kim, Y-W. and Boyer, R.R., TMS, p. 135.Google Scholar
3. Kim, Y-W. and Dimiduk, D.M., JOM, 43, 40 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Inui, H., Nakamura, A., Oh, M.H. and Yamaguchi, M., Phil. Mag., 66, 557 (1992).Google Scholar
5. McClintock, F.A. and Argon, A.S., editors, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Addison-Wesley Pub Co., p. 560 (1966).Google Scholar
6. Davidenkov, N.N., Diannicheskaya Ispytania Metallov, Moscow (1936).Google Scholar
7. Shih, D.S. and Scarr, G.K., High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV, edited by Johnson, L.A., Pope, D.P., Stiegler, J.O., MRS Symp. Proc, 213, 727 (1991).Google Scholar