Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:08:09.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metal-Graphite Couples Synthesized by Means of Mechanical Milling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

I. Estrada-Guel ,
C. Carreño-Gallardo ,
R. Pérez-Bustamante ,
J. M. Herrera-Ramírez  and
R. Martínez-Sánchez
I. Estrada-Guel
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (CIMAV), Laboratorio Nacional de Nanotecnología, Miguel de Cervantes No. 120, C.P. 31109, Chihuahua, Chih., México.
C. Carreño-Gallardo
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (CIMAV), Laboratorio Nacional de Nanotecnología, Miguel de Cervantes No. 120, C.P. 31109, Chihuahua, Chih., México.
R. Pérez-Bustamante
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (CIMAV), Laboratorio Nacional de Nanotecnología, Miguel de Cervantes No. 120, C.P. 31109, Chihuahua, Chih., México.
J. M. Herrera-Ramírez
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (CIMAV), Laboratorio Nacional de Nanotecnología, Miguel de Cervantes No. 120, C.P. 31109, Chihuahua, Chih., México.
R. Martínez-Sánchez
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (CIMAV), Laboratorio Nacional de Nanotecnología, Miguel de Cervantes No. 120, C.P. 31109, Chihuahua, Chih., México.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this work is the characterization of some graphite-metal couples prepared by mechanical milling (MM). The morphological and microstructural changes during MM of graphite processed with metallic powders of Cu, Ni and Ag (10 and 15 at. %) are studied. Milling is performed in a high-energy ball mill under an inert atmosphere during 1, 4 and 8 hours. The process is also repeated with a pure graphite sample in order to compare the role of metal type and concentration on the morphological characteristics of milled samples. The results show that increasing the concentration of metal particles accelerates the milling process as a result of faster work hardening and particle fracture. The results of X-ray diffraction analysis show that some crystallographic characteristics of the milled couples change as a function of milling time and metal addition. Also, SEM-EDS studies show an important effect of milling time on metal particle distribution in the prepared graphite couples.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1276: Advanced Structural Materials–2010 , 2010 , 15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kondoh, K., Fukuda, H., Umeda, J., Imai, H., Fugetsu, B., M. Endo. Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 527, 4103–4108 (2010).Google Scholar
2. Li, Q., Rottmair, C. A., R. F. Singer. Comp. Sci. Tech. (2010). In Press.Google Scholar
3. Ravi, K.R., Sreekumar, V.M., Pillai, R.M., Mahato, C., Amaranathan, K.R., Arul Kumar, R., B C. Pai. Mat. Design, 28, 871–881 (2007).Google Scholar
4. Y?lmaz, O., Buytoz, S., Com. Sci. Tech. 61, 2381–2392 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Achutha, M.V., Sridhara, B.K., Abdul Budan, D., Mat. Design 29, 769–774 (2008).Google Scholar
6. Torralba, J.M., da Costa, C.E., F. Velasco. J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 133, 203–206 (2003).Google Scholar
7. Ip, S.W., Sridhar, R., Toguri, J.M., Stephenson, T.F., A.E.M. Warner. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 244, 31–38 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Mayer, H., Papakyriacou, M.. Carbon 44, 1801–1807 (2006).Google Scholar
9. Akhlaghi, F., Pelaseyyed, S.A.. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 385, 258–266 (2004).Google Scholar
10. Durai, T.G., Karabi Das, Siddhartha Das. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 445–446, 100–105 (2007).Google Scholar
11. Rodríguez-Guerrero, A., Sánchez, S.A., Narciso, J., Louis, E., F. Rodríguez-Reinoso. A. Mater. 54, 1821–1831 (2006).Google Scholar
12. Sharma, S.P., S.C. Lakkad. Surface & Coatings Tech. (2010). In Press.Google Scholar
13. Fogagnolo, J.B., Ruiz-Navas, E.M., Robert, M.H., J.M. Torralba. S. Mater. 47, 243–248 (2002).Google Scholar
14. Daoud, A.. Mat. Lett. 58, 3206–3213 (2004).Google Scholar
15. Suryanarayana, C.. Prog. Mat. Sci. 46, 1–184 (2001).Google Scholar
16. Esawi, A.M.K., Morsi, K., Sayed, A., Taher, M., S. Lanka. Comp. Sci. Tech. (2010). In PressGoogle Scholar