Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T07:59:54.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Microindentation Behavior of Several Mollusk Shells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

V. J. Laraia  and
A. H. Heuer
V. J. Laraia
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
A. H. Heuer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
Get access

Abstract

An investigation of the relationship between structure and mechanical behavior is reported for mollusk shells employing foliated, nacreous, and crossed-lamellar structures by microindentation in the Knoop and Vickers geometries. Indentation damage zones develop crack systems that reflect the micro-architecture. For the crossed-lamellar structure, the system of cracks about the indentation normally developed in a brittle material is suppressed. Previous reports that shells are harder than the corresponding minerals, calcite and aragonite, are confirmed, but it is found that this effect can be strongly dependent on orientation. This anomalous hardness is not an artifact of the identation test technique, since scratch tests confirm the relative hardness of shell over the mineral. It is suggested that microstructural organization is of central importance in producing this hardness, as opposed to intrinsic properties of the mineral or matrix phases.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 174: Symposium R – Materials Synthesis Utilizing Biological Processes , 1989 , 125
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bøggild, O.B., danske, K. Vidensk Selsk. Skr. Copenhagen, 2, 232 (1930).Google Scholar
2. Taylor, J.D. and Layman, M., Paleontology, 15, 73 (1972)Google Scholar
3. Currey, J.D. and Kohn, A.J., J. Mater. Sci., 11, 1615 (1976).Google Scholar
4. Sarikaya, M., Gunnison, K., and Aksay, I., Proceedings of the 47 th Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, Ed. Bailey, G.W., 558 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Laraia, V.J. and Heuer, A.H., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 72, 2177 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Weiner, S., Calc. Tissue Int., 29, 163 (1979)Google Scholar
7. Lawn, B. and Wilshaw, R., J. Materials Science, 10, 1049 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Laraia, V.J., Aindow, M. and Heuer, A.H., This Proceedings.Google Scholar
9. Bull, S.J., Page, T.F., and Yoffe, E.H., Phil. Mag. Lett., 59, 281 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Cahn, R.W., Adv. Physics, 3, 363 (1954)Google Scholar
11. Hall, E.O., Proc. Phys. Soc. London, 643, 747 (1951).Google Scholar
12. Petch, N.J., J. Iron Steel Inst. London, 173 25 (1953).Google Scholar