Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:19:43.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling of Temperatures in Cementitious Monoliths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. Kaushal
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
D. M. Roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 Also affiliated with the Department of Materials Science and Engineering
P. H. Licastro
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Temperatures in large cementitious monoliths (works) can rise very high due to unfavorable thermal properties such as low conductivity and high diffusivity of the monolith and the surrounding media. Heat moderation becomes necessary in such situations to avoid excessive thermal stresses. Moderation due to the addition of inert additives such as sand in mortars is compared to that obtained by the addition of reactive but low heat evolution substituents such as Class C and Class F fly ashes. Substitution of cement by slag has also been considered. The hydration temperatures for the extreme conditions (adiabatic) have been experimentally measured and compared to those predicted under real conditions. Such a simulation has been made by measuring the thermal properties and analyzing the temperature distribution due to exothermic reactions as predicted by a finite differences computer model. In general, lower temperatures can be maintained by increasing the thermal conductivity and heat capacity of the hydrating material. This material can be tailored for both heat evolution and setting times by incorporating inert additives such a sand (quartz) and/or reactive additives such as slag and fly ash.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Roy, D.M., Luke, K. and Diamond, S., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal I, edited by McCarthy, G.J. and Lauf, R.J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.43 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985), pp. 320.Google Scholar
2. Kaushal, S., Roy, D.M., Licastro, P.H. and Langton, C.A., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh,1986), pp. 311320.Google Scholar
3. Gotsis, C., Roy, D.M., Licastro, P.H. and Kaushal, S., in Concrete at Early Ages (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, 1986), pp. 4970.Google Scholar
4. Idorn, G.M. and Henrikson, K.R., Cem. Concr. Res. 14, pp. 463470 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Idorn, G.M., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986), pp. 310.Google Scholar
6. Luke, K. and Glasser, F.P., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization, Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh,1986), pp. 173180.Google Scholar
7. Rousan, A.A. and Roy, D.M., I&EC Product Research and Development 22, 349351 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Gotsis, C., ATHENAN: Axisymmetric Thermal Nonlinear Analyses–A Computer Program for Cements and Other Chemically Reactive Cylindrical Domains and Associated Computer Graphic Algorithms, Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA (1984).Google Scholar