Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:45:15.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moisture Effects on Gold Nanowear

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Megan Pendergast
Affiliation:
mpenderg@mail.usf.edu, University of South Florida, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. ENB118, Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Alex A. Volinsky
Affiliation:
volinsky@eng.usf.edu, University of South Florida, Mechanical Engineering, 4202 E Fowler Ave. ENB118, Tampa, FL, 33620, United States, 813-974-5658, 813-974-3539
Xiaolu Pang
Affiliation:
xiaolupang@gmail.com, University of South Florida, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. ENB118, Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Robert Shields
Affiliation:
rjs@mail.usf.edu, University of South Florida, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. ENB118, Tampa, FL, 33620, United States
Get access

Abstract

The addition of water results in the higher wear rate of gold compared to experiments performed in the ambient environment (approximately 60% humidity). This higher wear rate in water has been observed with the AFM, Hysitron Triboindenter, and additionally in single pass scratch tests performed with the Taber Shear/Scratch tester. These tests were preformed using silicon nitride cantilevers on the AFM and a conical diamond tip in the Taber instrument. Tests performed in the ambient atmosphere resulted in slightly reduced surface roughness, while much higher wear rate was observed in the wear tests performed in water. Ambient scratch tests produced slightly shallower scratch trenches than wet scratches consistently as a function of the varied normal load. Single scan lines provide valuable information about the mechanisms and progression of the nanoscale wear. The different components of scratch friction are investigated to explore the main contributors to the nanoscale scratching of gold.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bull, S.J., Wear 233-235, 412423 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Stebut, J. von, Surf. Coat. Tech. 200, 346350 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Tschiptschin, A.P., Garzon, C.M., Lopez, D.M., Tribol. Int. 39, 167174 (2006).Google Scholar
4. ASTM Standard G 171-03: Standard test method for scratch hardness of materials using a diamond stylus (2003).Google Scholar
5. Xie, Y., Hawthorne, H.M., Wear 240, 6571 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Wong, M., Lim, G.T., Moyse, A., Reddy, J.N., Sue, H.J., Wear 256, 12141227 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Wong, M.H., Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University (2003).Google Scholar
8. Bertrand-Lambotte, P., Loubet, J.L., Verpy, C., Pavan, S., Thin Solid Films 420-421, 281286 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Zhao, Q., Zhao, Z., Kazazic, E., Embree, M., Trinh, P., Lam, T., Chang, S., Wear 252, 654661 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Li, J.C.M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 317, 197203 (2001).Google Scholar
11. Liu, Z., Sun, J., Shen, W., Tribol. Int. 35, 511522 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Li, K., Shapiro, Y., Li, J.C.M., Acta Mater. 46(15), 55695578 (1998).Google Scholar
13. Wu, J., Cheng, X.H., Wear 261, 12931297 (2006).Google Scholar