Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T07:06:48.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantifying Field-Induced Contrast Effects in Photoelectron Emission Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

K. Siegrist
Affiliation:
National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
V. W. Ballarotto
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Physical Sciences, 8050 Greenmead Dr, College Park, MD 20740
E. D. Williams
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Physical Sciences, 8050 Greenmead Dr, College Park, MD 20740 Dept. of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Get access

Abstract

Samples consisting of electrically isolated titanium lines fabricated on a titanium surface were used to quantify voltage-induced contrast effects in photoelectron emission microscopy (PEEM). Induced contrast effects were observed to extend 6 μm for a -5 V bias applied to a 303 nm tall raised line. We therefore explored, via numerical calculation, the spatial extent of the perturbation to the PEEM accelerating field caused by the bias applied across the step height. The intensity full width at half minimum agreed well with the calculated width defined by the 10% level of lateral field strength. For a line 550 nm tall, a correspondence was found for a calculated width defined by a 5% lateral field strength. It was observed that neighboring structures a few μm away affected the image contrast, for sufficiently strong applied bias. This suggests that effects can easily be induced at distances of 0.5 μm for modest applied voltages, as has been previously observed for structures buried under oxide layers 0.5 μm thick [1].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Siegrist, K., Ballarotto, V. W., Williams, E. D., App. Phys. Lett., in review (2003).Google Scholar
2. Bauer, E., Ultramicroscopy 17, 51 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Rempfer, G. F., Griffith, O. H., Ultramicroscopy 27, 273 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Rempfer, G. F., Nadakavuraken, K. K., Griffith, O. H., Ultramicroscopy 5, 437 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Nepijko, S. A., Sedov, N. N., Schmidt, O., Schonhense, G., Bao, X., Huang, W., Journal of Microscopy 202, 480 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Siegrist, K., Ballarotto, V. W., Williams, E. D., Jour. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 21, 1098 (2003).Google Scholar
7. CPO-3D is a simulation program from RBC Ltd., Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
8. Harting, E., and Read, F., Electrostatic Lenses (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976).Google Scholar