Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T06:56:13.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Damage in Natural Titanite by Crystal Structure Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

M. E. Fleet  and
G. S. Henderson
M. E. Fleet
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
G. S. Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Study of radiation damage in natural titanite (CaTiSiO5) permits estimation of the long-term performance of titanite-bearing glass ceramics in the immobilization of radioactive waste. Single-crystal X-ray structure analyses have been made on two geologically old, U, Th-bearing titanites (sphenes), on an undamaged gem-quality titanite and on their annealed equivalents. The alpha-damaged titanite crystal structure is characterized by a marked increase in magnitude of the apparent thermal parameters of all structural positions, reflecting a general increase in positional disorder. The ratio of observed structure factors (F0-damaged/F0-annealed) may be used to estimate the overall structural damage.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 50: Symposium STOCKHOLM – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX , 1985 , 363
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hayward, P.J. and Cecchetto, E.V., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IV, edited by S.V., Topp (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1982), pp. 91–98.Google Scholar
2. Hayward, P.J., Doern, F.E., Cecchetto, E.V., Mitchell, S.L., Canad. Mineral. 21, 611 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Deer, W.A., Howie, R.A., Zussman, J., Rock Forming Minerals 1a, 2nd. ed. (Longman, London, 1982).Google Scholar
4. Nesbitt, H.W., Bancroft, G.M., Karkhanis, S.N., Fyfe, W.S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management III, edited by C., Northrup (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1980), pp. 131–138.Google Scholar
5. Higgins, J.B. and Ribbe, P.H., Am. Mineral. 61, 878 (1976).Google Scholar
6. Cerny, P. and Povondra, P., Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Monatsch. 1972, 400.Google Scholar
7. Vance, E.R. and Metson, J.B., Phys. Chem. Mineral., (in press).Google Scholar
8. Taylor, M. and Brown, G.E., Am. Mineral. 61, 435 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Mongiorgi, R. and Sanserverino, L.R. Di, Mineral. Petrogr. Acta 14, 123 (1968).Google Scholar
10. Speer, J.A. and Gibbs, G.V., Am. Mineral. 61, 238 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Hollabaugh, C.L. and Foit, F.F. Jr., Am. Mineral. 69, 725 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Fleet, M.E., Acta Cryst. C40, 1491 (1984).Google Scholar
13. Fleet, M.E. and Mowles, T.A., Acta Cryst. C40, 1778 (1984).Google Scholar
14. Bursill, L.A. and McLaren, A.C., Phys. Stat. Sol. 13, 331 (1966).Google Scholar
15. Vance, E.R., Efstathiou, L., Hsu, F.H., Rad. Effects 52, 61 (1980).Google Scholar
16. Krivoglaz, M.A., Theory of X-ray and Thermal-Neutron Scattering by Real Crystals (Plenum, New York, 1969), pp. 249–258.Google Scholar
17. Larson, B.C. and Schmatz, W., Phys. Rev. B10, 2307 (1974).Google Scholar
18. Vance, E.R., Karioris, F.G., Cartz, L., Wong, M.S., in Advances in Ceramics 8, edited by G.G., Wicks and W.A., Ross (American Ceramic Society, 1984), pp. 62–70.Google Scholar