Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:22:39.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Segregation to and Phase Transition at Σ5 (310)/[001] Tilt Grain Boundaries in Ni3−xAl1+x Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

R. Najafabadi
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Department of Materials Science & Eng., Ann Arbor, MI 48109
D. J. Srolovitz
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Department of Materials Science & Eng., Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Get access

Abstract

The free energy simulation method and EAM type potentials are employed to study segregation to the Σ5 (310)/[001] tilt grain boundary and its free energy in ordered Ni3−xAl1+x alloys. For 300K≤T≤900K, there is weak Al and Ni segregation to the grain boundary in the stoichiometric and Ni-rich (76.6 at. %) alloys, respectively. In the Al-rich (73.5 at. %) alloy, however, there is strong Al segregation. Al segregation induces the formation of a thin, orderedx AlNi layer at the boundary. The width of this layer grows as the temperature is decreased to approximately 6 Å at 300K. The grain boundary segregation decreases the grain boundary free energy by less than 10% in the stoichiometric and Ni-rich alloys, and by 30% in the Al-rich alloys, respectively. These results suggest a new model to explain the observed brittleness of grain boundaries in polycrystalline Ni3Al. In this model, the brittleness of Ni3Al alloys is attributed to the formation of an intrinsically brittle, thin AlNi layer at grain boundaries. This brittle layer can be removed by increasing the grain boundary Ni content - either by changing the alloy composition or due to cosegregation with B.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sieloff, D. D., Brenner, S. S., and Ming Jian, H., MRS Symp. Proc. 133, 213 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Sieloff, D. D., Brenner, S. S., and Burke, M.G., MRS Symp. Proc. 83, 87 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Baker, I., Schulson, E. M., Michael, J. R., and Pennycook, S. J., Phil. Mag. B 62, 659 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Baker, I., Schulson, E. M., and Michael, J. R., Phil. Mag. B 57, 379 (1988).Google Scholar
5. George, E. P., Liu, C. T., and Padgett, R. A., Scripta Metall. 23, 979 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Baker, I. and Schulson, E. M., Scripta Metall. 23 ,1883 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Kung, H., Rasmussen, D. R., and Sass, S. L., submitted to Acta Metall. Mater. Google Scholar
8. Chen, S. P., Srolovitz, D. J., and Voter, A. F., J. Mat. Res. 4, 62 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Chen, S. P., Voter, A. F., Albers, R. C., Boring, A. M., and Hay, P. J., J. Mat. Res. 5, 955 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Ackland, G. J. and Vitek, V., MRS Symp. Proc. 133, 106 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Kruisman, J. J., Vitek, V., and De Hosson, J. Th. M., Acta Metall. 36, 2729 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Foiles, S. M. and Daw, M. S., J. Mat. Res. 2, 5 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Foiles, S. M., paper presented at TMS Fall Meeting, Detroit (1990).Google Scholar
14. Najafabadi, R., Wang, H. Y., Srolovitz, D. J., and LeSar, R., MRS Symp. Proc. 213, 51 (1990).Google Scholar
15. Yan, M., Vitek, V., and Ackland, G. J., preprint.Google Scholar
16. Taub, A. I. and Briant, C. L., Acta Metall. 35, 427 (1987).Google Scholar
17. Schulson, E. M., Baker, I., and Frost, H. J., MRS Symp. Proc. 83, 1195 (1987).Google Scholar
18. Brenner, S. S. and Ming-Jian, H., Scipta Met. 24, 671 (1990).Google Scholar
19. LeSar, R., Najafabadi, R., and Srolovitz, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 624 (1989).Google Scholar
20. Najafabadi, R., Srolovitz, D. J., and LeSar, R., J. Mater. Res. 5, 2663 (1990).Google Scholar
21. Najafabadi, R., Wang, H. Y., Srolovitz, D. J., and LeSar, R., Acta Metall. Mater., in press.Google Scholar
22. Voter, A. F. and Chen, S. P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 82, 175 (1987).Google Scholar