Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T17:05:57.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical Modelling in Materials Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

G. Pouskouleli ,
A. Ahmad ,
T.A. Wheat ,
S. Varma  and
S.E. Prasad
G. Pouskouleli
Affiliation:
Mineral Science Laboratories, CANMET, Dept Energy, Mines & Resources, Ottawa, ON
A. Ahmad
Affiliation:
Mineral Science Laboratories, CANMET, Dept Energy, Mines & Resources, Ottawa, ON
T.A. Wheat
Affiliation:
Mineral Science Laboratories, CANMET, Dept Energy, Mines & Resources, Ottawa, ON
S. Varma
Affiliation:
Sensor Technology Ltd., 20 Stewart Road, Collingwood, ON, Canada
S.E. Prasad
Affiliation:
Sensor Technology Ltd., 20 Stewart Road, Collingwood, ON, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The role of statistical modelling in materials research is examined. It is shown that considerable benefits can be derived by following an appropriate full factorial design, in which a number of factors (process parameters) are varied simultaneously while the responses (materials properties) are monitored. It is also shown that by using a fractional factorial matrix, essentially the same conclusions can be drawn with a significantly smaller number of experimental trials. Examples drawn from recent materials research on glasses and ceramics are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 291: Symposium O – Materials Theory and Modeling , 1992 , 273
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pouskouleli, G. and Wheat, T.A., Jour. Can. Ceram. Soc. 59 [4] 41–46 1990.Google Scholar
2. Pouskouleli, G. and Wheat, T.A., Jour. Can. Ceram. Soc. 61 [3] 184–189 1992. Google Scholar
3. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G. and Hunter, J.S., Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design. Data Analysis and Model Building. (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
4. McLean, R.A. and Anderson, V.L., Applied Factorial and Fractional Designs. (M. Dekker Inc., New York, 1987).Google Scholar
5. Cornell, J.A., Experiments with Mixtures: Designs. Models and the Analysis of Mixture Data, (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
6. Phadke, M.S., Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1989).Google Scholar
7. Khuri, A.I. and Cornell, J.A., Response Surfaces. Designs and Analyses. (M. Dekker Inc., New York, 1984).Google Scholar
8. Pouskouleli, G., Wheat, T.A., Ahmad, A., Varma, S. and Prasad, S.E., in Submolecular Glass Chemistry and Physics, edited by Bray, P. and Kreidl, N.J. (SPIE Proc 1590 Boston, 1991) pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
9. Varma, S., Prasad, S.E., Murley, I., and Wheat, T.A., in Infrared Fiber Optics III, edited by Harrington, J.A. and Katzir, A., (SPIE Proc. 1591, Boston, 1991) pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
10. Varma, S., Prasad, S.E., Ahmad, A., Wheat, T.A., and Abe, K., in Proc. SPACEBOUND'92. edited by Wilkinson, R., (Canadian Space Agency, Ottawa, 1992) pp. 109–114.Google Scholar
11. Douglas, E. and Pouskouleli, G., “Prediction of Compressive Strength of Mortars Made with Portland Cement – Blast–furnace Slag – Fly Ash Blends”, Cement and Concrete Research, 21 523–534, 1991.Google Scholar