Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:47:23.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anodic Aluminum Oxide (AAO) Membranes for Neurite Outgrowth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2013

Meghan E. Casey ,
Anthony P. Ventura ,
Wojciech Z. Misiolek  and
Sabrina Jedlicka
Meghan E. Casey
Affiliation:
Bioengineering
Anthony P. Ventura
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Institute for Metal Forming
Wojciech Z. Misiolek
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Institute for Metal Forming
Sabrina Jedlicka
Affiliation:
Bioengineering Materials Science and Engineering Center for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
Get access

Abstract

Anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) membranes were fabricated in a mild two-step anodization procedure. The voltage was varied during both anodization steps to control the pore size and morphology of the AAO membranes. Pore sizes ranged from 34 nm to 117 nm. Characterization of the pore structure was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To assess the potential of the AAO membranes as a neuronal differentiation platform, C17.2 neural stem cells (NSCs), an immortalized and multipotent cell line, were used. The NSCs were forced to differentiate via serum-withdrawal. Cellular growth was characterized by immunocytochemistry (ICC) and SEM. ImageJ software was used to obtain phenotypic cell counts and neurite outgrowth lengths. Results indicate a highly tunable correlation between AAO nanopore sizes and differentiated cell populations. By selecting AAO membranes with specific pore size ranges, control of neuronal network density and neurite outgrowth length was achieved.

Keywords

biomaterialceramicbiological
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1498: Symposium L – Biomimetic, Bio-inspired and Self-Assembled Materials for Engineered Surfaces and Applications , 2013 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kempermann, G., Jessberger, S., Steiner, B., Kronenberg, G., Trends Neurosci. 27, 447–452 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, D. C., Song, H., Colamarino, S. A., Ming, G. and Gage, F. H., Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 44, 399–421 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, E. Y., Deitcher, D. L., Walsh, C., Arnold-Aldea, S., Hartwieg, E. A. and Cepko, C. L., Cell 68, 33–51 (1992).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, E. Y., Yoon, C., Flax, J. D. and Macklis, J. D., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 11663–11668 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Zhang, L. and Metzger, R. M., Chem. Mater. 10, 2470–2480 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belwalkar, A., Grasing, E., Van Geertruyden, W., Huang, Z. and Misiolek, W. Z., J Memb Sci. 319, 192–198 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, A., Hu, C., Yang, Y. and Lin, C., Electrochimica Acta 53, 2258–2264 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J., Tian, J. H., Shi, J., Zhang, F.. He, D. L., Liu, L., Jung, D. J., Bai, J. B. and Chen, Y., Microelectronic Engineering 88, 1714–1717 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuda, H. and Fukuda, K., Science 268, 1466–1468 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulka, G. D., Stroobants, S., Moshchalkov, V., Borghs, G. and Celis, J. P., J Electrochem. Soc. 149, D97–D103 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, J., Spangler, S., Seeburg, D. P., Hoogenraad, C. C. and Sheng, M., J Neurosci. 25, 11300–11312 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar