Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:32:47.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anomalous Temperature dependence of Fermi-edge Singularity in Modulation-doped AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs hetero-structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

K. Gopalakrishna Naik
Affiliation:
Department of physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India.
K.S.R.K. Rao
Affiliation:
Email address of corresponding author: ksrkrao@physics.iisc.ernet.in
T. Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Lucknow Road, Delhi-110 054, India.
R. Muralidharan
Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Lucknow Road, Delhi-110 054, India.
S. K. Mehta
Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Lucknow Road, Delhi-110 054, India.
Get access

Abstract

The temperature and power dependence of Fermi-edge singularity (FES) in high-density two-dimensional electron gas, specific to pseudomorphic AlxGa1-xAs/InyGa1-yAs/GaAs heterostructures is studied by photoluminescence (PL). In all these structures, there are two prominent transitions E11 and E21 considered to be the result of electron-hole recombination from first and second electron sub-bands with that of first heavy-hole sub-band. FES is observed approximately 5 -10 meV below the E21 transition. At 4.2 K, FES appears as a lower energy shoulder to the E21 transition. The PL intensity of all the three transitions E11, FES and E21 grows linearly with excitation power. However, we observe anomalous behavior of FES with temperature. While PL intensity of E11 and E21 decrease with increasing temperature, FES transition becomes stronger initially and then quenches-off slowly (till 40K). Though it appears as a distinct peak at about 20 K, its maximum is around 7 - 13 K.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Skolnick, M. S., Rorison, J. M., Nash, K. J., Mowbray, D. J., Tapster, P. R., Bass, S. J., and Pitt, A. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2130 (1987).Google Scholar
2 Brown, S. A., Young, J. F., Wasileski, Z., and Coleridge, P. T., Phys. Rev. B 56, 3937 (1997).Google Scholar
3 Chen, W., Fritze, M., Walecki, W., Nurmikko, A. V., Ackley, D., Hong, J. M. and Chang, L. L., Phys. Rev. B 45, 8464 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Xu, S. J., Chua, S. J., Tang, X. H., and Zhang, X. H., Phys. Rev. B 54, 17701 (1996).Google Scholar
5 Kissel, H., Muller, U., Walther, C., Masselink, W. T., Mazur, Yu. I., Tarasov, G. G., Valakh, G. Y., Malyarchuk, V., and Zhuchenko, X. Y., Phys. Rev. B 61, 8359 (2000).Google Scholar
6 Ruckenstein, A. E. and Schmitt-Rink, S., Phys. Rev. B 35, 7551 (1987).Google Scholar
7 Uenoyama, T. and sham, L. J., Phys. Rev. B 39, 11 044 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Mueller, J. F., Phys. Rev. B 42, 11 189 (1990).Google Scholar
9 Hawrylak, P., Phys. Rev. B 44, 3821 (1991).Google Scholar
10 Rodriguez, F. J. and Tejedor, C., J. Phys: Condens. Matter. 8, 1713 (1996).Google Scholar
11 Meulen, H. P. van der, Santa-Olalla, I., Rubio, J., Calleja, J. M., Friedland, K. J., Hey, R., and Ploog, K., Phys. Rev. B 60, 4897 (1999).Google Scholar
12 Huard, V., Cox, R. T., Saminadayar, K., Aroult, A., and Tatarenko, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 187 (2000).Google Scholar
13 Hawrylak, P., Phys. Rev. B 42, 8986 (1990); 44, 3821 (1991); 44, 6262 (1991); 45, 4237 (1992).Google Scholar
14 Meulen, H. P. van der, Santa-Olalla, I., Rubino, J., Calleja, J. M., Friedlan, K. J., Hey, R., and Ploog, K., Phys. Rev. B 60, 4897 (1999).Google Scholar
15 Kissel, H., Zeimer, U., Maaßdorf, A., Weyers, M., Heitz, R., Bimberg, D., Mazur, Yu. I., Tarasov, G. G., Kunets, Vas. P., Müller, U., Zhuchenkao, Z. ya., and Masselink, W. T., Phys. Rev. B 65, 235320 (2002).Google Scholar
16http://www.wsi.tu-muenchen.de/nextnano3/Google Scholar
17 Masselink, W. T., Kissel, H., Muller, U., Walther, C., Mazur, Yu. I., Tarasov, G. G., Rud'ko, G. Yu. and Zhuchenko, M. Ya., Semicond. Phys. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron. 3, 126 (2000).Google Scholar
18 Mellin, T. and Larulle, F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 852, (2000)Google Scholar
19 Fano, U., Phys. Rev. 124, 1866, (1961).Google Scholar