Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:56:01.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atom- and Radical-Surface Sticking Coefficients Measured Using Resonance Enhanced Multiphoton Ionization (REMPI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Robert M. Robertson  and
Michel J. Rossi
Robert M. Robertson
Affiliation:
Present Address: Applied Materials Corporation, Santa Clara CA 95054
Michel J. Rossi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Kinetics, SRI International, Menlo Park CA 94025
Get access

Abstract

Sticking coefficients γ of neutral transient species at ambient temperature were measured using in situ Resonance Enhanced Multiphoton Ionization (REMPI) of the transients in a Knudsen cell. γ for I and CF3I‡ on a stainless steel surface were 0.16 and >0.5, respectively, whereas γ for CF3 on the same surface was measured to <0.01; γof SiH2 on a growing carbon containing amorphous silicon surface was 0.11; this value increased to 0.15 for interaction of SiH2 with a “pure” growing silicon-hydrogen surface, and γ of SiH2‡ on both types of surfaces was found to be >0.5.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 131: Symposium E – Chemical Perspectives of Microelectronic Materials I , 1988 , 251
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Robertson, R. M., Golden, D. M. and Rossi, M. J., J. Phys. Chem., 92, 5338 (1988); J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A5, 3351 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Selamoglu, N., Rossi, M. J. and Golden, D. M., J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2400 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Robertson, R. M., Golden, D. M. and Rossi, M. J., J. Chem. Phys. 89, 2925 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Hess, W. P., Kohler, S. C., Haugen, H. K., and Leone, S. R., J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2143 (1986); W. P. Hess and S. R. Leone, J. Chem. Phys., 86, 3773 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Saxena, S. C. and Joshi, R. K., in Thermal Accomodation and Adsorption Coefficients of Gases, McGraw-Hill/CINDAS Data Series on Material Properties, Vol. II–1, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1981.Google Scholar
6. Engstrom, J. R., Nelson, M. M. and Engel, T., This Symposium (E: Chemical Perspectives of Electronic Materials).Google Scholar
7. Benson, S. W., Kondo, O. and Marshall, R. M., Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 19, 829 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Duignan, M. T., Hudgens, J. W. and Wyatt, J. R., J. Phys. Chem. 86, 4156 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Winters, H. F., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 5165 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Robertson, R. M. and Rossi, M. J., submitted to J. Chem. Phys.Google Scholar
11. Perrin, J. and Broekhuizen, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 433 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Buss, R., Ho, P., Breiland, W. G. and Coltrin, M. E., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 2808 (1988).Google Scholar
13. Gates, S. M., Surf. Sci. 195, 307 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar