Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T07:00:40.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Band Offsets In GaN/AlN and AlN/SiC Heterojunctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Nadia Binggeli ,
Philippe Ferrara  and
Alfonso Baldereschi
Nadia Binggeli
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique Appliquée, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Philippe Ferrara
Affiliation:
Biochemisches Institut der Universität Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
Alfonso Baldereschi
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique Appliquée, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the structural trends of the band offsets in GaN/AlN and AlN/SiC heterojunctions using the ab initio pseudopotential method. In the zincblende GaN/AlN (100), (110), and (111) heterojunctions, the band offsets are relatively insensitive to interface orientation. Bulk strain effects, however, can modify the offset by as much as 0.4 eV in coherently strained AlN/GaN and GaN/AlN (100) junctions. The band alignment in the heterovalent AlN/SiC (110) and (111) heterojunctions depends on the geometry and stoichiometry of the interface. Valence band offsets as high as 2.5 eV are obtained for neutral AlN/SiC(11) junctions with a mixed Al/Si interface layer and as low as 1.3 eV with a mixed N/C layer. Atomic relaxation plays a major role in determining the offset. The change from zincblende (111) to wurtzite (0001) crystal structure in GaN/AlN and AlN/SiC heterojunctions selectively affects the conduction band offset, and has only a minor influence on the valence discontinuity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 482 , 1997 , 911
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Troullier, N. and Martins, J. L., Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Baroni, S., Resta, R., Baldereschi, A. and Peressi, M., in Spectroscopy of Semiconductor Microstructures, edited Fasol, G., Fasolino, A., and Lugli, P. (Plenum, New York, 1989), p. 251.Google Scholar
3. For the calculation treating the Ga-3d orbitals of GaN as core states, we used the same energy cutoff as in the calculations for the AIN and SiC systems.Google Scholar
4. Binggeli, N., Ferrara, P., and Baldereschi, A., to be published.Google Scholar
5. Kim, K., Lambrecht, W. R. L., and Segall, B., Phys. Rev. B 53, 16310 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Lambrecht, W. R. L. and Segall, B., in Properties of Group III nitrides, edited by Edgar, J. H. (INSPEC, London, 1994), p. 135; these authors give an estimate for the 3C-A1N bandgap using the experimental 2H value and a theoretical prediction for the 3C and 2H bandgap difference.Google Scholar
7. A self-energy correction of -0.2 eV on the GaN valence band edge has been calculated by Palummo, M. et al., Europhys. Lett. 26, 607 (1994). Assuming a linear scaling with the band gap, one finds -0.2 eV as a rough estimate for the correction on the AIN/GaN and SiC/AlN VBO's.Google Scholar
8. The GaN and AIN hydrostatic deformation potentials were evaluated using a technique that eliminates the non-bulk effects of the effective charges.Google Scholar
9. Nardelli, M. B., Rapcewicz, K., and Bernholc, J., Phys. Rev. B 55, R7323 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Wei, S. H. and Zunger, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2719 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Lambrecht, W. R. L. and Segall, B., Phys. Rev. B 43, 7070 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Majewski, J. A., Städele, M., and Vogl, P., in Proceedings of the XXIII International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors, edited by Scheffler, M. and Zimmermann, R. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), p. 983.Google Scholar
13. Yoshida, S., in Properties of Silicon Carbide, edited by Harris, G. L. (INSPEC, London, 1995), p. 74.Google Scholar
14. Peressi, M., Baroni, S., Baldereschi, A. and Resta, R., Phys. Rev. B 48, 12047 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Ferrara, P., Binggeli, N., and Baldereschi, A., Phys. Rev. B 55, R7418 (1997).Google Scholar
16. Nicolini, R., Vanzetti, L., Mula, G., Bratina, G., Sorba, L., Franciosi, A., Peressi, M., Baroni, S., Resta, R., Baldereschi, A., Angelo, J. E., and Gerberich, W. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 294 (1994).Google Scholar