Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:46:22.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bias Dependent TMR in Fe/MgO/Fe(100) Tunnel Junctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ivan Rungger
Affiliation:
runggeri@tcd.ie, Trinity College Dublin, School of Physics, College Street, Dublin, N/A, 2, Ireland, 0035316088454
Alexandre Reily Rocha
Affiliation:
rochaa@tcd.ie, Trinity College, School of Physics, Dublin, N/A, 2, Ireland
Oleg Mryasov
Affiliation:
Oleg.Mryasov@seagate.com, Seagate Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15222, United States
Olle Heinonen
Affiliation:
Olle.G.Heinonen@seagate.com, Seagate Technology, Bloomington, Minnesota, 55435, United States
Stefano Sanvito
Affiliation:
sanvitos@tcd.ie, Trinity College, School of Physics, Dublin, N/A, 2, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

We calculate from first principles the I-V characteristics of Fe/MgO/Fe(100) tunnel junctions. In particular we compare the zero-bias transmission with self-consistent calculations at finite bias. In the case the magnetizations of the two Fe layers are parallel to each other, at small bias there is a significant contribution to the transmission coming from the minority spin channel. This is due to a sharp resonance in the transmission coefficient close to the Fermi level, originating from a surface state. As a bias exceeding 25 mV is applied, the surface states get out of resonance and the current through the minority spin channel saturates, so that the current flows mainly through the majority channel. The same effect is not present for the antiparallel alignment of the magnetization with the net result of large TMR at low bias, which then saturates for a bias larger than 25 mV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Yuasa, S., Nagahama, T., Fukushima, A., Suzuki, Y., and Ando, K., Nature Materials 3 868 (2004).Google Scholar
2 Parkin, S. S. P., Kaiser, C., Panchula, A., Rice, P. M., Hughes, B., Samant, M., and Yang, S.H., Nature Materials 3 862 (2004).Google Scholar
3 Butler, W. H., Zhang, X.G., Schulthess, T. C., and MacLaren, J. M., Phys. Rev. B 63 054416 (2001).Google Scholar
4 Belashchenko, K. D., Velev, J., and Tsymbal, E. Y., Phys. Rev. B 72, 140404(R) (2005).Google Scholar
5 Wortmann, D., Bihlmayer, G., and Blügel, S., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S5819 (2004).Google Scholar
6 Heiliger, C., Zahn, P., Yavorsky, B. Y., and Mertig, I., Phys. Rev. B 72, 180406(R) (2005).Google Scholar
7 Rocha, A. R., Garcia-Suarez, V. M., Bailey, S., Lambert, C., Ferrer, J., and Sanvito, S., Phys. Rev. B 73, 085414 (2006); A. R. Rocha, V. M. Garcia-Suarez, S. Bailey, C. Lambert, J. Ferrer, and S. Sanvito, Nature Materials 4 335 (2005).Google Scholar
8 Soler, J. M., Artacho, E., Gale, J. D., Garcia, A., Junquera, J., Ordejon, P., and Sanchez-Portal, D., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 2745 (2002).Google Scholar
9 Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., and Ernzerhof, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865 (1996).Google Scholar