Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T23:57:26.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cage Breaking Threshold in DLPD of C60

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

Yusuf S. Hascicek ,
Alfred Kleinhammes  and
Louis R. Testardi
Yusuf S. Hascicek
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
Alfred Kleinhammes
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
Louis R. Testardi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
Get access

Abstract

Thin film patterns of desired shape or configuration made of about 15 μm - lines were directly written from a disk of C60 by employing a new laser technique called direct laser patterned deposition (DLPD). DLPD is an ambient technique, needing no special environment or material preparation. Since the ablation and deposition are very localized and deposition and patterning are done in one step this is a very cost efficient process. An energy density threshold was found. Above this density resistance of DLPD films dropped sharply indicating that the C60 cage was broken at least in part of the film.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 285: Symposium I – Laser Ablation in Materials Processing–Fundamentals and Applications , 1992 , 581
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kroto, H. W., Heath, J. R., O'Brien, S. C., Curl, R. F., Smalley, R. E., Nature 318, 162 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Kratschmer, W., Fostiropoulos, K., and Huffman, D. R., Chem. Phys. Lett. 170, 167 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Rosseisky, M. J., Ramirez, A. P., Glarum, S. H., Murphy, D. W., Haddon, R. C., Hebard, A. F., Palstra, T. T. M., Kortan, A. R., Zahurak, S. M., Makhija, A. V., Phys. Rew. Lett. 66, 2830 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Meilunas, R.J., Chang, R. P. H., iUu, S., Kappes, M. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3461 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Hascicek, Y. S., Kleinhammes, A., Testardi, L R., To be published in J. Mater. Sci. Lett. Google Scholar
6. Hascicek, Y. S., Kle inhammes, A., Dorin, V., Testardi, L R., Sol. State Comm. 84, 197 (1992)Google Scholar
7. Kratschmer, W., Lamb, L. D., Fostiropoulos, K. and Huffman, D. R., Nature 347, 354 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Cox, D. M., Behal, S., Disko, M., Gorun, S. M., Greaney, M., Hsu, C. S., Kollin, E. B., Millar, J., Robbins, J., Robbins, W., Sherwood, R. D., and Tindall, P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 2940 (1991)Google Scholar