Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:27:09.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Color Switchable Goggle Lens Based on Electrochromic Polymer Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Chao Ma
Affiliation:
machao@u.washington.edu, University of Washington, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seattle, Washington, United States
Chunye Xu
Affiliation:
chunye@u.washington.edu, University of Washington, Mechanical Engineering Department, Seattle, Washington, United States
Get access

Abstract

We have developed a set of new electrochromic devices (ECDs) for special application goggles, whose color can be switched between transparent and a specific color mode, i.e. blue (B). This paper will discuss the design, film deposition, device assembly and characterizations of the color switchable lens. The ECD is composed of a layer of thin film conducting polymer poly (3,4-(2,2-dimethylpropylenedioxy)thiophene) (PProDOT-Me2), a layer of thin film inorganic oxide V2O5-TiO2, and a layer of ionic conductive electrolyte. The thin films are electrochemically deposited on ITO coated flexible plastic substrate. The whole device is packaged with an UV cured flexible film sealant. The goggle lens exhibit tuneable shade in visible light wave length (380-800nm), with a maximum contrast ratio at 580nm. Meanwhile, other unique properties include fast switching speed, low driving voltage, memory function (no power needed after switching, bistable), great durability, high flexibility, light weight, and inexpensiveness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dain, S.J., Clin Exp Optom. 86(2), 77 (2003).10.1111/j.1444-0938.2003.tb03066.xGoogle Scholar
2 Kullavanijaya, P. and Lim, H.W., J Am Acad Dermatol. 52(6), 937 (2005).10.1016/j.jaad.2004.07.063Google Scholar
3 Xu, C., Liu, L., Legenski, S.E., Ning, D., and Taya, M., J. Mater. Res. 19(7), 2072 (2004).10.1557/JMR.2004.0259Google Scholar
4 Skotheim, T.A., Elsenbaumer, R.L., and Reynolds, J.R., Handbook of conducting polymers, 2nd Ed., (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, US, 1998).Google Scholar
5 Kerko, D.J., Morgan, D.W., and Morse, D.L., Patent, U.S., No 4 608 349 (1986).Google Scholar
6 Havens, T.G., Kerko, D.J., Patent, U.S., No 4 979 976, (1990).Google Scholar
7 Ma, C., Taya, M., and Xu, C., Electrochimica Acta, 54, 598605 (2008)10.1016/j.electacta.2008.07.049Google Scholar
8 Ma, C., Taya, M., and Xu, C., Polymer Engineering and Science, 48 (11), 22242228 (2008).10.1002/pen.21169Google Scholar
9 Xu, C., Tamagawa, H., Uchida, M., and Taya, M., Proceeding of SPIE. 4695, 442 (2002).10.1117/12.475192Google Scholar
10 Welsh, D.M., Kumar, A., Meijer, E.W., and Reynolds, J.R., Advanced Materials. 11(16), 1379 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199911)11:16<1379::AID-ADMA1379>3.0.CO;2-Q3.0.CO;2-Q>Google Scholar
11 Kim, S., Taya, M., and Xu, C., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 928, 160167 (2006).10.1557/PROC-0928-GG14-26Google Scholar
12 Xu, C., Ma, C., Kong, X., and Taya, M., Polymers for Advanced Technology, 20, 178182 (2009)10.1002/pat.1250Google Scholar