Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:09:25.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary on Studies of 36Cl in the Exploratory Studies Facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

William M. Murphy
William M. Murphy*
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, TX 78238USA
Get access

Abstract

36Cl data from the Exploratory Studies Facility (ESF) at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, reported by LANL researchers [1,2,3,4] provide important empirical constraints on the velocity and pathways for water flow under natural conditions in the unsaturated zone at Yucca Mountain. It has been concluded that some data exhibiting exceptionally high 36Cl/Cl ratios (i.e., greater than 1250×10−15 [3]) indicate unambiguous bomb pulse contamination and fast groundwater travel times to depths of the proposed waste emplacement horizon. Several lines of evidence indicate that some ESF samples with 36Cl/Cl ratios greater than 900×10−15 to 1000×10−15 are also affected by bomb pulse contamination. The distribution of 36Cl/Cl data can be well represented by a mixture of two normally distributed populations, which are hypothesized to represent uncontaminated and bomb pulse contaminated sets. The transition between these groups occurs at 36Cl/Cl between 600×10−15and 1000× 10−15, and the hypothesized contaminated samvles comprise 20 to 25 percent of the total. Shapiro-Wilk statistics confirm that when samples with 36Cl/Cl ratios greater than about 1000×10−15 are included, the distribution deviates from normality. Variation in the Earth's magnetic field, which is a primary mechanism for variation in natural 36Cl production, also appears to be normally distributed, supporting the hypothesis that natural, relatively undecayed 36Cl/Cl ratios are normally distributed. Further evidence that samples with 36Cl/Cl greater than 950×10−15 to 1000×10−15 are likely to have a bomb pulse component is provided by the spatial correlation of these samples with those containing unambiguous contamination at values greater than 1250×10−15. Zones in which elevated 36Cl/Cl ratios are localized constitute about 23 percent of the length of the ESF at the level of the proposed waste emplacement horizon.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 506: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI , 1997 , 407
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Fabryka-Martin, J.T., Wolfsberg, A.V., Dixon, P.R., Levy, S., Musgrave, J., and Turin, H.J. LA-CST-TIP-96-002 (Draft 29 August 1996), YMP milestone report 3783M. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.Google Scholar
2 Fabryka-Martin, J.T., Turin, H.J., Wolfsberg, D., Brenner, D., Dixon, P.R., and Musgrave, J.A. LA-CST-TIP-96-003 (Draft 30 August 1996), YMP milestone report 3782M. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.Google Scholar
3 Levy, S.S., Sweetkind, D.S., Fabryka-Martin, J.T., Dixon, P.R., Roach, J.L., Wolfsberg, L.E., Elmore, D., and Sharma, P. LA-EES-1-TIP-97-004 (Draft 12 March 1997), YMP milestone report SP2301M4. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.Google Scholar
4 Fabryka-Martin, J.T., Dixon, P.R., Levy, S., Liu, B., Turin, H.J., and Wolfsberg, A.V. LAUR-96-1384, YMP milestone report 3783AD. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM (1996).Google Scholar
5 Plummer, M.A., Phillips, F.M., Fabryka-Martin, J., Turin, H.J., Wigand, P.E., and Sharma, P. Science, 277, p. 538 (1997).Google Scholar
6 Shapiro, S.S. The ASQC Basic References in Quality Control: Statistical Techniques. (American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, WI 1990) v. 3.Google Scholar
7 IMSL User's Manual FORTRAN subroutines for statistical analysis. (IMSL, Houston, TX 1991).Google Scholar
8 Barnett, V., and Lewis, T. Outliers in Statistical Data. (Wiley, New York 1994).Google Scholar
9 Lehman, B., Laj, C., Kissel, C., Mazaud, A., Paterne, M., and Labeyrie, L. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 93, p. 269 (1996).Google Scholar
10 Stoner, J.S., Channell, J.E.T., and Hillaire-Marcel, C. Earth Planet. Sci. Let., 134, p. 237 (1995).Google Scholar
11 Guyodo, Y, and Valet, P.-P. Earth Planet. Sci. Let., 143, p. 23 (1996).Google Scholar
12 Merrill, R.T., and , McElhinny. The Earth's Magnetic Field. (Academic Press, New York 1983).Google Scholar
13 McFadden, P.L., and McElhinny, M.W. J. Geomag. Geoelect., 34, p. 163 (1982).Google Scholar
14 Stamatakos, J.A., and Murphy, W.M. In preparation.Google Scholar