Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T14:23:38.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of the Behaviour of Vitrified HLW in Repositories in Salt, Clay and Granite: Part II: Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J.A.C. Marples ,
W. Lutze ,
M. Kawanishi  and
P. van Iseghem
J.A.C. Marples
Affiliation:
Harwell Laboratory, Didcot, Oxon OX11 ORA, UK
W. Lutze
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner Institut, Glienicker Strasse 100, D1000 BERLIN 39, FRG.
M. Kawanishi
Affiliation:
Abico Research Laboratory, Abico, Chiba–pre, 270–11, Japan
P. van Iseghem
Affiliation:
SCK/CEN, B–2400, Mol, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

A ‘Round Robin’ test of the European Commission 's “Repository Systems Simulation Test” has been undertaken. This involved testing an inactive simulant of the French high-level waste glass SON68 (RTT7) in containers which also held backfill, geological materials and water. Ten laboratories undertook the granite option, six salt and three clay. The test procedure was closely specified and is given in detail in a companion paper [1]. Experiments with glass powder and (optionally) solid specimens in contact with aqueous solutions were run for periods of up to one year at 90 °C and the solutions were analysed for Si, B, Li and Mo (compulsory) and other constituents of the corroded glass (optional). The analytical results are used to compare the performance of the glass under conditions representing those that might occur in future repositories in the three media.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 275
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Mertens, L.A., Lutze, W., Marples, J.A.C., Iseghem, P. van and Vernaz, E.: “A comparison of the behaviour of vitrified HLW in repositories in salt, clay and granite: I, Experimental.” This conference (1990).Google Scholar
[2] Boult, K.A., Hough, A., Marples, J.A.C. and Robertson, G.P.. Harwell Laboratory, U.K. report AERE R-13369 (1988).Google Scholar
[3] McMenamin, T. et al. “EC Repository Systems Simulation Test - Final Report”. European Commission Report EUR12544EN (1990).Google Scholar
[4] Marples, J.A.C., Harwell Laboratory, UK Report AERE R13660 (1989).Google Scholar
[5] Kawanishi, M. and Lutze, W. Hahn Meitner Institut Report (1989).Google Scholar
[6] Ohe, T. and Tsukamoto, M.. “The results of the EC Round Robin Test” Central Research Institute of the Electrical Power Industry (CRIEPI), Japan, Report (1989).Google Scholar
[4) Fournier, R.O. and Rowe, J.J. American Mineralogist 62, 1052 (1977).Google Scholar
(5] Mertens, L.A. and Lutze, W. in European Commission Report EUR 12017 (to be published).Google Scholar
[6) Lutze, W., Muller, R. and Montserrat, W. in Scientific basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E.. Mater Res Soc Proc 112, Pittsburgh, PA (1988), pp 576–584.Google Scholar
[7] JSS Project Report: 84–01 (1984).Google Scholar