Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:21:40.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composite Geopolymeric Binders of Fly Ash, Effect of the Particle Size and Addition of Calcium Aluminate Cement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2013

L.L Cardona-Hernández  and
J.I. Escalante-García
L.L Cardona-Hernández
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Saltillo.
J.I. Escalante-García
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Unidad Saltillo.
Get access

Abstract

An investigation on composite geopolymeric binders, based on alkali activated fly ash (PFA) substituted with low-alumina calcium aluminate cement (CAC), was carried out using a Factorial experimental design in which the factors and levels were: %Na2O, 8-12%; modulus of the solution Ms=SiO2/Na2O =0 - 2, 10-30 wt% of CAC and fineness of PFA (D90) from 161.8 to 6.46 microns. The contribution of each factor was estimated with the 28-day compressive strength as the response variable. The curing temperature was 24h@60°C, and then at 20°C until mechanical testing. The specimens were also characterized by XRD and SEM. The results showed that the grinding modified the morphology of the PFA without changing the crystallographic or chemical characteristics as detected by XRD; and improved the mechanical properties of the geopolymers. The strength increased notably with the Ms up to 1, and reduced for Ms >1; the strength increased with the %Na2O and %CAC. Electron microscopy showed a higher densification at smaller PFA particle size, and the CAC addition promoted the formation of zeolite and Na2O-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O products.

Keywords

compositeadditiveschemical composition
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1612: Symposium 4B – Concrete and Durability of Concrete Structures , 2013 , imrc2013-s4b-p006
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

MacKenzie, K. J. D., Advances in ceramic matrix composites IX Ceramic Transactions, 153, 175 (2003).Google Scholar
Joseph, Davidovits, J. Therm. Anal., 37, 1633 (1991).Google Scholar
Duxson, P, Fernández-Jiménez, A, Provis, J L, Lukey, G C, Palomo, A, Van Deventer, J S J, J. Mater. Sci., 42, 2917 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmings, R.T., Berry, E. E., Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, 113, 3 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, , Yunlu, , Lighty, , JoAnn, S, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49(6), 5214 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, HFW, “Cement Chemistry”, (Ed. Telford, Thomas, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Jiménez, A, Palomo, A, Sobrados, I, Sanz, J, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 91(1-3), 111 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardjito, D., Wallah, S.E., Dimensi Teknik Sipil, 6, 88 (2004).Google Scholar
Hardjito, D., Wallah, S.E., International Conference on Recent Advances in concrete Technology, (2004).Google Scholar
Midgley, H G, Midgley, A, Magn. Concr. Res., 27, 59 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capmas, A, George, C M, Proceedings of engineering foundation conference, 377 (1994).Google Scholar
Scrivener, K, Cabiron, J L, Letournex, R, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 1215 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández- Jiménez, A, Vázquez, T, Palomo, A, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 94(4), 1297 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar