Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:20:15.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compositional Evolution of FePt Nanoparticles Prepared by Different Organometallic Synthesis Routes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Chandan Srivastava  and
Gregory B Thompson
Chandan Srivastava
Affiliation:
sriva001@bama.ua.edu, The University of Alabama, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, United States
Gregory B Thompson
Affiliation:
Gthompson@eng.ua.edu, The University of Alabama, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, United States
Get access

Abstract

Self-assembled FePt nanoparticle arrays are candidate structures for ultrahigh density magnetic storage media. One of the factors limiting their application to this technology is particle-to-particle compositional variation. In the present study, an analysis is provided for the formation mechanism of FePt nanoparticles synthesized from the thermal decomposition of Fe(CO)5 and the reduction of FeCl2 by superhydride. In both processes, Pt rich seeds initially form from the reduction of Pt acetylacetonate. The particle formation mechanism has been studied by extracting particles at different stages of the synthesis and individually determining particle-to-particle composition by STEM-XEDS. In the case Fe(CO)5, the Fe is gradually incorporated into the Pt seeds and produces a wide variation in compositional distribution about the mean value. In contrast, the FeCl2 has a nearly instantaneous shift in composition to the average value with the introduction of the superhydride reducing agent. The discrepancies in compositional uniformity between the two processes will be discussed in terms of the intrinsic differences between the different precursors.

Keywords

chemical synthesisorganometallicscanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1032: Symposium I – Nanoscale Magnetic Materials and Applications , 2007 , 1032-I10-13
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Farrow, R.F.C., Weller, D., Marks, R.F., Toney, M.F., Cebollada, A. and Harp, G.R., Journal of Applied Physics 79, 5967 (1996).10.1063/1.362122Google Scholar
2. Yu, Andrew C. C., Mizuno, M., Sasaki, Y., and Kondo, H., Applied Physics Letters 85, 6242 (2004).10.1063/1.1835998Google Scholar
3. Saita, S., Maenosono, S., physica status solidi 203(6), 1206 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Sun, S., Murray, C. B., Weller, D., Folks, L. and Moser, A., Science 287, 1989 (2000).10.1126/science.287.5460.1989Google Scholar
5. Sun, S., Anders, S., Thomson, T., Baglin, J. E. E., Toney, M. F., Hamann, H. F., Murray, C. B., and Terris, Bruce D., Journal of Physical Chemistry B 107, 5419 (2003).10.1021/jp027314oGoogle Scholar
6. Bagaria, H.G., Johnson, D.T., Srivastava, C., Thompson, G.B., Shamsuzzoha, M. and Nikles, D.E., Journal of Applied Physics 101, 1 (2007).10.1063/1.2724330Google Scholar
7. Carlino, E. and Grillo, V., Physical Review B 71, 235303 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.71.235303Google Scholar
8. Srivastava, C., Balasubramanian, J., Thompson, G. B., Turner, C., Wiest, John and Bagaria, Hitesh, in press, Journal of Applied Physics (2007).Google Scholar