Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T23:37:51.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compression, Bend, and Tension Studies on Forged Al67Ti25Cr8 and Al66Ti25Mn9 L12 Compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

K.S. Kumar ,
S. A. Brown  and
J.D. Whittenberger
K.S. Kumar
Affiliation:
Martin Marietta Laboratories, Baltimore, MD 21227
S. A. Brown
Affiliation:
Martin Marietta Laboratories, Baltimore, MD 21227
J.D. Whittenberger
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135
Get access

Abstract

Cast, homogenized, and isothermally forged aluminum-rich L12 compounds Al87Ti25Cr8 and Al66Ti25Mn9 were tested in compression as a function of temperature and as a function of strain rate at elevated temperatures (1000K and 1100K). Three-point bend specimens were tested as a function of temperature in the range 300K to 873K. Strain gages glued on the tensile side of the ambient and 473K specimens enabled direct strain measurements. A number of “buttonhead” tensile specimens were electro-discharge machined, fine polished, and tested between ambient and 1073K for yield strength and ductility as a function of temperature. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) examination of fracture surfaces from both the bend and tensile specimens revealed a gradual transition from transgranular cleavage to intergranular failure with increasing temperature.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 213: Symposium Q – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV , 1990 , 481
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kumar, K. S. and Herring, R. A., Scripta Metall. et Materialia 24, 1713 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Zhang, S., Nic, J. P., Milligan, W. W., and Mikkola, D. E., Scripta Metall. et Materialia 24, 1441 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Mabuchi, H., Hirukawa, K., Tsuda, H., and Nakayama, Y., Scripta Metall. et Materialia 24, 505 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Brown, S. A., Kumar, K. S., and Whittenberger, J. D., Scripta Metall. et Materialia 24, 2001 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Zhang, S., Nic, J. P., and Mikkola, D. E., Scripta Metall. et Materialia 24, 57 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Schneibel, J. H., Horton, J. A., and Porter, W. O., submitted to J. Mater. Res. (1990).Google Scholar
7. Whittenberger, J. D., Mater. Sci. Eng. 57, 77 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Wee, D. M., Pope, D. P., and Vitek, V., Acta Metall. 32, 829 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Takasugi, T. and Izumi, O., Acta Metall. 33, 39 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Liu, C. T. and White, C. L., Acta Metall. 35, 643 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Taub, A. I., Chang, K. -M., and Liu, C. T., Scripta Metall. 20, 1613 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar