Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:31:21.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cost performance trade-off in thermoelectric modules with low fractional area coverage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2012

Kazuaki Yazawa
Affiliation:
Baskin School of Engineering, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 , U.S.A.
Ali Shakouri
Affiliation:
Baskin School of Engineering, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 , U.S.A. Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We report a comprehensive study of the cost of materials used in the thermoelectric module as the elements, substrate, and metal interconnect are optimized for maximum output power. The power conversion cost [$/W] is analyzed. The maximum power output is found by matching both thermal and electrical impedances to the external load and heat sink. The fractional area coverage or fill factor of the thermoelement (leg) in the module is a key factor which affects the overall cost of the waste heat recovery system. Thermal spreading resistance is a function of the thermal conductivity and the thickness of the substrates. Also the air gap between the legs contributes to parasitic heat loss from the hot to the cold substrate through heat conduction and radiative heat transfer. The optimum fill factor under atmospheric air-pressure is found to be on the order of a few percent. We also take into account the three-dimensional current flow and the effect of the metallization thickness on the series resistance in the module. Calculations identify the minimum metal trace thickness needed to have a minimum impact on output power generation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Eder, A. and Linde, M., U.S. DOE Thermoelec. Appl. Workshop, 2011, online material Google Scholar
2. Hussain, Q. E., Brigham, D. R., and Maranville, C. W., Proc. of SAE, (2009), paper no. 2009-01-1327 Google Scholar
3. Nagao, K.; Nagai, A.; Fujii, I.; Sakurai, T.; Fujimoto, M.; Furue, T.; Hayashida, T.; Imaizumi, Y.; Inoue, T, Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Thermoelec., (1998), pp. 468472 Google Scholar
4. Yazawa, K., Shakouri, A., Proc. Intl. Mech. Eng. Conf. - IMECE2010, ASME, (2010).Google Scholar
5. Yazawa, K., Shakouri, A., Env. Sci. & Tech., J of ACS, Vol. 45, No.17, (2011), pp.75487553 Google Scholar
6. Yazawa, K., Shakouri, , J of Applied Physics, -paper in review Google Scholar
7. He, X., Li, Y., Wang, L., Sun, Y., Zhang, S., Thin Solid Films, 517, (2009), pp. 51205129 Google Scholar
8. Aksyutov, L. N., J. Eng. Phys. and Thermophysics, Vol. 27, No.2, (1974), pp. 913917 Google Scholar
9. Potkay, J. A. and Sacks, R.D., J of Microelectromechanical Sys., (2007), Vol. 16, No. 5.Google Scholar
10. Berger, H.H., Solid-Stare Electronics, Vol. 15, (1972), pp. 145158 Google Scholar
11. Ono, M., Nishiyama, A., Toriumi, A., Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 46, (2002), pp. 13251331 Google Scholar