Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:12:38.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crack Growth in Hardened Cement Paste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

K. D. Baldie  and
P. L. Pratt
K. D. Baldie
Affiliation:
Imperial College, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, London SW7 2BP.
P. L. Pratt
Affiliation:
Imperial College, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, London SW7 2BP.
Get access

Abstract

The subcritical crack growth parameter (n) has been determined both from the variation in the crack velocity (V) with stress intensity (K) in double torsion specimens, and from the variation in critical stress intensity (Klc) with loading rate (x) in single edge-notch bend specimens. As in previous cases for hardened cement paste (HCP), and other inhomogeneous materials, the value of n determined using double torsion specimens (˜70) was higher than that determined using SENB (˜30).

Backscattered electron image examination of cracks in polished sections of HCP has shown that all of the components, both hydration products and anhydrous phases, are involved in determining crack paths although, as expected; calcium silicate hydrate and calcium hydroxide form the majority of the crack path; unnhydrated cement cores are resistant to crack growth and cause the crack to deviate around them. There is some evidence that crack growth occurs by the formation and coalescence of microcracks ahead of the crack tip, with only a limited formation of an actual process zone.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 64: Symposium S – Cement-Based Composites: Strain Rate Effects on Fracture , 1985 , 47
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Evans, A.G., Int. J. Fract., 10, 251 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Beaudoin, J.J., Submitted to Cem. Concr. Res. (1985)Google Scholar
[3] Davidge, R.W., McLaren, J.R. and Tappin, G., J. Mat. Sci., 8, 1699 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Trantina, G.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 60, 338 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Pletka, B.J. and Wiederhorn, S.M., J. Mat. Sci., 17, 1247 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Nadeau, J.S., Mindess, S. and Hay, J.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 57, 51 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Mindess, S., Nadeau, J.S. and Hay, J.M., Cem. Concr. Res., 4, 953 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Mindess, S. and Nadeau, J.S., Ceramic Bulletin, 56,429 (1977)Google Scholar
[9] Brown, J.H., Private communication.Google Scholar
[10] Mindess, S., Private communication.Google Scholar
[11] Baskaran, S., Bhaduri, S.B. and Hasselman, D.P.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 68, 112 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Diamond, S., Proc. Cement and Concrete Assoc. Conference, 2, Sheffield (1976)Google Scholar
[13] Dalgleish, B.J., Pratt, P.L. and Moss, R.I., Cem. Concr. Res., 10, 665 (1980)Google Scholar
[14] Fuller, E.R., ASTM, STP 678, (1978)Google Scholar
[15] Brown, W.F. and Srawley, J.E., ASTM, STP 410, (1969)Google Scholar
[16] Grudemo, A., Cem. Concr. Res., 9, 19 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Higgins, D.D. and Bailey, J.E., Proc. Cement and Concrete Assoc. Conference, 283, Sheffield (1976)Google Scholar
[18] Evans, A.G. and Faber, K.T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 67, 255 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Feldman, R.F. and Sereda, P.J., Engineering Journal, 53, 53 (1970)Google Scholar
[20] Bentur, A., Berger, R.L., Lawrence, F.V., Milestone, N.B., Mindess, S. and Young, J.F., Cem. Concr. Res., 9, 83 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Pletka, B.J., Fuller, E.R. and Koepke, B.G., ASTM, STP 678, (1978)Google Scholar
[22] Hubner, H. and Jillek, W., J. Mat. Sci., 12, 117 (1979)Google Scholar
[23] Higgins, D.D. and Bailey, J.E., J. Mat. Sci., 11, 1995 (1976)Google Scholar
[24] Grudemo, A., CBI Forskning, 6, 1 (1977)Google Scholar
[25] Hillerborg, A., Cem. Concr. Res., 13, 69 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Leevers, P.S. and Williams, J.G., J. Mat. Sci., 20, 77 (1985)Google Scholar