Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T23:50:34.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Technical Issues Related to Near-Field Materials Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

John W. Shade
John W. Shade*
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Some test parameters have become issues in test development either because they are difficult to measure and control or because the significance of their effect on waste form dissolution and alteration is unknown. Issues identified by the MCC are Eh/pH system effects, SA/V effects, temperature effects on sampling, waste package composition effects, colloid formation and stability, radiolysis, and formation kinetics and stability of secondary reaction products. These issues are addressed by the MCC through literature reviews, workshops, and direct investigation with the objective of recommending methods for resolving them. This paper summarizes their status and attempts to identify needs required for their resolution.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 44: Symposium N – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII , 1984 , 775
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 White, W. B. and Freeborn, W. P., “The Role of Oxidation Potential, Eh, In the Dissolution of Nuclear Waste Materials”, In Workshop of Leaching Mechanisms, Summary Rep., PNL-4382 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1982).Google Scholar
2 Mendel, J. E., (Compiler), “Final Report of the Defense High-Level Waste Leaching Mechanisms Program”, PNL-5157 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Freeborn, W. P. and White, W. B., “The Role of Eh in Nuclear Waste Form Dissolution”, (Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Management VII, McVay, G. L., ed., p. 719–726, 1984).Google Scholar
4 Jantzen, C. M., “Effects of Eh (Oxidation Potential) on Borosilicate Waste Glass Durability”, (In Nucl. Waste Management; Role in Ceramics, Vol. 8, Wicks, G. G. and Ross, W. A., ed., p. 385–393, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Jantzen, C. M., “Methods of Simulating Low Redox Potential (Eh) for a Basalt Repository”, (Sci. Basis for Nucl. Waste Management VII, McVay, G. L., ed., p. 613–621, 1984).Google Scholar
6 Lindberg, R. D. and Runnells, D. D., “A Critical Analysis of the State of Equilibrium of Redox Reactions on Ground Waters, Applied to Eh Measurements and to Geochemical Modelling”, (Science Vol. 225, p. 925–927, 1984).Google Scholar
7 Lasaga, A. C., “Chemical Kinetics of Water-Rock Interactions”, (Jour. Geophys. Res., V. 89, p. 4009–4025, 1984).Google Scholar