Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:19:39.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of Soft-Interface Materials for Highly Sensitive Bio-Sensing Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Madoka Takai
Madoka Takai*
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Two typed bio-conjugated soft-interface for highly sensitive immunoassay was developed by integrating a phospholipid polymer. Nano-sphered surface with poly [2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC)-co-n-butyl methacrylate (BMA)-co-p-nitrophenyloxycarbonyl poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (MEONP)]: PMBN) was prepared by electrospray deposition (ESD) method. The three dimensional nano-sphered surface can be captured an antibody with high density around 860 ng/cm2. The theoretical amount of closest packed immobilized antibodies on flat surface is around 650 ng/cm2, thus large amount of antibodies were immobilized on the nano-sphere surface. The water stability of PMBN nanostructure was improved by crosslinking with 1,4-butylenediamine and by heating. Both heated and cross-linked PMBN nanostructure was not changed at all remaining high porosity after immersing in water. The specific signal in the immunoassay was enhanced with both heated and cross-linked PMBN nanostructure. The PMBN nanostructure which has high porosity and high water stability realized highly sensitive immunoassay.

As the other platform, we developed a novel soft-interface consisting of a well-defined phospholipid polymer surface on which Staphylococcal Protein A (SpA) was site-selectively immobilized. The phospholipid polymer platform was prepared on silicon substrates using the surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) technique. Orientation-controlled antibodies were achieved using enzymatic reactions, and these antibodies captured 1.8 ± 0.1 antigens on average, implying that at least 80% of immobilized antibodies reacted with 2 antigens. Theoretical multivalent binding analysis further revealed that orientation-controlled antibodies had antigen-antibody reaction equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) as low as 8.6 × 10-10 mol/L, whereas randomly oriented and partially oriented antibodies showed Kd values of 2.0 × 10-7 mol/L and 1.2 × 10-7 mol/L, respectively. These findings support the significance of antibody orientation because controlling the orientation resulted in high reactivity and theoretical binding capacity.

Keywords

biomaterialsensornanoscale
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1599: Symposium P – Biological and Bioconjugated Materials for Electronic Devices , 2014 , JSAPMRS13-1599-6908
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kuwabara, K., Ogino, M., Ando, T., Miyauchi, A., Applied Physics Letters, 93: 033904(1)-033904(3) (2008).Google Scholar
Valsesia, A., Mannelli, I, Colpo, P., Bretagnol, F., Rossi, F., Analytical Chemistry, 80: 7336–7340 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soukka, T., Harma, H., Paukkunen, J., Lovgren, T., Analytical Chemistry, 73: 2254–2260 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Y., Lee, J. M., Jung, H. and Chung, B. H., Analytical Chemistry, 79: 6534–6541 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrie, S. M., Mrksich, M., Analytical Chemistry, 79: 5878–5887 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B. Y., Swearingen, C. B., Ho, J. A., Romanova, E. V., Bohn, P. W., Sweedler, J. V., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129: 7620–7626 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goto, Y., Matsuno, R., Konno, T., Takai, M., Ishihara, K., Biomacromolecules, 9: 828–833 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, K., Nomura, H., Mihara, T., Kurita, K., Iwasaki, Y., Nakabayashi, N., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 39: 323–330 (1998).3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshimoto, K.; Nishio, M.; Sugasawa, H.; Nagasaki, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7982–7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J-W, Kurosawa, S., Aizawa, H., Goda, Y., Takai, M., and Ishihara, K., Analyst, 131, 155–162 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishizawa, K., Konno, T., Takai, M. and Ishihara, K., Colloid Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 77, 263–269(2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, N., Takai, M., Ishihara, K., Analytical Chemistry, 83,1969–1976(2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishizawa, K., Konno, T., Takai, M., Ishihara, K., Biomacromolecules, 9: 403–407 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, W., Zhu, S., Ishihara, K., Brash, J., Langmuir 21:5980–5987 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, W., Zhu, S., Ishihara, K., Brash, J., Biointerphases 1: 50–60 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S. R., Lutes, A. T., Barbari, T. A., Journal of Membrane Science, 282: 311–321 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar