Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:39:07.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Matrix Diffusion Properties of Granite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Pirkko Holtta
Affiliation:
pirkko.holtta@helsinki.fi, University of Helsinki, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, A.I. Virtasen aukio 1, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland, +358 50 3029406
Marja Siitari-Kauppi
Affiliation:
marja.siitari-kauppi@helsinki.fi, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O. Box 55, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland
Nina Huittinen
Affiliation:
nina.huittinen@helsinki.fi, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O. Box 55, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland
Antti Poteri
Affiliation:
antti.poteri@vtt.fi, VTT Processes, P.O. Box 1608, VTT, FI-02044, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Rock–core column experiments were introduced to estimate the diffusion and sorption properties of Kuru Grey granite used in block–scale experiments. The objective was to examine the processes causing retention in solute transport through rock fractures, especially matrix diffusion used to estimate the importance of retention processes during transport in different scales and flow conditions. Rock–core columns were constructed from cores drilled into the fracture and were placed inside tubes to form flow channels in the 0.5 mm gap between the cores and the tube walls. Tracer experiments were performed using uranine, HTO, 36Cl, 131I, 22Na and 85Sr at flow rates of 1–50 µlmin-1. Rock matrix was characterized using 14C–PMMA method, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X–ray micro analysis (EDX) and the B.E.T. method.

Solute mass flux through a column was modelled by applying the assumption of a linear velocity profile and a molecular diffusion. Coupling of the advection and diffusion processes was based on the model of generalised Taylor dispersion in the linear velocity profile. Experiments could be modelled applying a consistent parameterization and transport processes. The results provide evidence that it is possible to investigate matrix diffusion at the laboratory scale. The effects of matrix diffusion were demonstrated on the slightly–sorbing tracer breakthrough curves. Based on scoping calculations matrix diffusion begins to be clearly observable for non–sorbing tracer when the flow rate is 0.1 μl×min-1. The experimental results presented here cannot be transferred directly to the spatial and temporal scales that prevail in an underground repository. However, the knowledge and understanding of transport and retention processes gained from this study is transferable to different scales from laboratory to in–situ conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Neretnieks, I., Eriksen, T. E., and Tähtinen, P., Water Resourc. Res. 18 (4), 849 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Hölttä, P., “Radionuclie migration in crystalline rock fractures–Laboratory study of matrix diffusion,” Doctoral Thesis, University of Helsinki. Report Series in Radiochemistry 20/2002, 55 p. + Appendices (2002).Google Scholar
3. Hölttä, P., Poteri, A., Hakanen, M. and Hautojärvi, A., Radiochimica Acta 92, 775 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Poteri, A. and Hölttä, P., Technical Research Centre of Finland Research Report. VTT/PRO1/1008/05, 37 p (2005).Google Scholar
5. Poteri, A. and Hölttä, P., Technical Research Centre of Finland Research Report. VTT-R-03919-06, 25 p. (2006).Google Scholar
6. Hellmuth, K-H., Siitari-Kauppi, M. and Lindberg, A., Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 13, 403 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Siitari-Kauppi, M., “Development of 14C-polymethylmethacrylate method for the characterisation of low porosity media,” Doctoral Thesis, University of Helsinki. Report Series in Radiochemistry 17/2002, 156 p (2002).Google Scholar
8. Hautojärvi, A. and Taivassalo, V., Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies. Report YJT-94-24 (1994).Google Scholar