Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:20:24.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Diffuse Interface Model for Void Formation under Non-Equilibrium Irradiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2011

Srujan Rokkam
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA
Anter El-Azab
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, 415 Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120, USA
Get access

Abstract

Void formation in irradiated materials is an intriguing and technologically important physical process associated with radiation damage. In this communication, we present a diffuse interface model for simulating void formation in materials under irradiation. Voids are treated as aggregates of vacancies left from the cascade damage. The emergence of the void ensembles in the irradiated material is modeled by an Allen-Cahn equation coupled with two Cahn-Hilliard equations governing the space and time evolution of vacancies and interstitials. The governing system of equations includes stochastic generation of point defects representing the cascade process, reaction of vacancies and interstitials, interaction of point defects with extended defects (viz., void surface and grain boundaries) and thermal fluctuations in defects. Numerical simulations demonstrating the model capabilities with respect to nucleation and growth of voids and swelling of the irradiated material are presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cawthorne, C. and Fulton, E. J., Nature 216, 575 (1967).Google Scholar
2. Stiegler, J.O. and Mansur, L. K., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 9, 405454 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Little, E. A. and Stow, D.A., J. Nucl. Mater. 87 (1), 2539 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Elen, J.D., Hamburg, G. and Mastenborek, A., J. Nucl. Mater. 39 (2), 194202 (1971).Google Scholar
5. Bralisford, A.D. and Bullough, R., J. Nucl. Mater. 44, 121135 (1972).Google Scholar
6. Trinkaus, H., Singh, B.N. and Golubov, S. I., J. Nucl. Mater. 283287(1), 8998 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Rokkam, S., El-Azab, A., Millett, P. and Wolf, D., Modell. Simul. Mat. Sci. Engng. 17, 064002 (2009).Google Scholar
8. Millet, P.C., Rokkam, S., El-Azab, A., Tonks, M. and Wolf, D., Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Engng. 17, 064003 (2009).Google Scholar
9. Millett, P.C., El-Azab, A., Rokkam, S., Tonks, M. and Wolf, D., Comp. Mat. Sci. 50, 949959 (2011).Google Scholar
10. Cahn, J.W. and Hilliard, J.E., J. Chem. Phys. 28 258267 (1958).Google Scholar
11. Allen, S.M. and Cahn, J.W., Act. Metall. 27, 10851095 (1979).Google Scholar