Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:29:19.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Contact Characteristics During Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Wonseop Choi ,
Seung-Mahn Lee  and
Rajiv K. Singh
Wonseop Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering and Particle Engineering Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-6400, USA
Seung-Mahn Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering and Particle Engineering Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-6400, USA
Rajiv K. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering and Particle Engineering Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-6400, USA
Get access

Abstract

In chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), it is critical to understand dynamic contact at the pad-particles-wafer interface for desired CMP performance. The dynamic contact is dependent on process variables (platen velocity and down pressure) and particle characteristics (size and concentration), which in turn affect friction force. In this study, we have characterized the dynamic contact at the pad-particles-wafer interface as a function of platen velocity and down pressure. In situ lateral friction force measurements were carried out for silica slurry / sapphire wafer system in order to investigate the dynamic contact during polishing. As solids loading increases, the slope in the friction force vs. platen velocity curve changes from a negative to a positive value. Friction force increases with down pressure for different solids loading conditions. Consequently, friction force is determined as a function of down pressure and platen velocity, validating a dynamic contact mechanism during CMP.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 767: Symposium F – Chemical-Mechanical Planarization , 2003 , F1.10
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Steigerwald, J.M. Murarka, S.P. and Gutmann, R.J. Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1997).Google Scholar
2. Avallone, E.A. and Baumeister, T., Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, Tenth Edition, McGraw-Hill (1995).Google Scholar
3. Moon, Y., Ph. D. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA, (1999).Google Scholar
4. Runnels, S.R. and Eyman, L.M. J. Electrochem. Soc., 141(6), p.1698 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Bhushan, M., Rouse, R., and Lukens, J.E. J. Electrochem. Soc., 141(11), p.3845 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Cook, L.M. J. of Non-Cryst. Solids, 120, p.152 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Yu, T.-K., Yu, C.C. and Orlowski, M., IEEE IEDM 865, 35.4.1. (1993).Google Scholar
8. Schlichting, H., Boundary Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, 116 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Johnson, K.L. Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1985).Google Scholar
10. Davies, R.D. Arnell, P.B. and Whomes, T.L. Tribology Principles and Design Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 124 (1991).Google Scholar