Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:58:19.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of B dose and Ge preamorphization energy on the electrical and structural properties of ultrashallow junctions in silicon-on-insulator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Justin J Hamilton
Affiliation:
j.hamilton@eim.surrey.ac.uk, University of Surrey, Advanced Technology Institute, Surrey Ion Beam Centre, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7NL, United Kingdom, +44 (0)1483686093, +44 (0)1483689404
Erik JH Collart
Affiliation:
erik_collart@amat.com, Applied Implant Technologies UK Ltd, Parametric and Conductive Implant Division, Foundry Lane, Horsham, West Sussex, RH13 5PX, United Kingdom
Benjamin Colombeau
Affiliation:
bcolombeau@charteredsemi.com, Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd., 60 Woodlands,, Industrial Park D,, Street 2,, N/A, 738406, Singapore
Massimo Bersani
Affiliation:
bersani@itc.it, ITC-irst Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologia, ITC-irst, Povo, Trento, 38050, Italy
Damiano Giubertoni
Affiliation:
giuberto@itc.it, ITC-irst Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologia, ITC-irst, Povo, Trento, 38050, Italy
Max Kah
Affiliation:
ee32mk@surrey.ac.uk, University of Surrey, Advanced Technology Institute, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Nicholas EB Cowern
Affiliation:
nick.cowern@surrey.ac.uk, University of Surrey, Advanced Technology Institute, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Karen J Kirkby
Affiliation:
k.kirkby@surrey.ac.uk, University of Surrey, Advanced Technology Institute, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Formation of highly activated, ultra-shallow and abrupt profiles is a key requirement for the next generations of CMOS devices, particularly for source-drain extensions. For p-type dopant implants (boron), a promising method of increasing junction abruptness is to use Ge preamorphizing implants prior to ultra-low energy B implantation and solid-phase epitaxy regrowth to re-crystallize the amorphous Si. However, for future technology nodes, new issues arise when bulk silicon is supplanted by silicon-on-insulator (SOI). Previous results have shown that the buried Si/SiO2 interface can improve dopant activation, but the effect depends on the detailed preamorphization conditions and further optimization is required. In this paper a range of B doses and Ge energies have been chosen in order to situate the end-of-range (EOR) defect band at various distances from the back interface of the active silicon film (the interface with the buried oxide), in order to explore and optimize further the effect of the interface on dopant behavior. Electrical and structural properties were measured by Hall Effect and SIMS techniques. The results show that the boron deactivates less in SOI material than in bulk silicon, and crucially, that the effect increases as the distance from the EOR defect band to the back interface is decreased. For the closest distances, an increase in junction steepness is also observed, even though the B is located close to the top surface, and thus far from the back interface. The position of the EOR defect band shows the strongest influence for lower B doses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (2005)Google Scholar
2 Lindsay, R., et. al, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 765, D7.4.1 (2003)Google Scholar
3 Colombeau, B., Smith, A.J., Cowern, N.E.B., Pawlak, B.J., Cristiano, F., Duffy, R., Claverie, A., Ortiz, C.J., Pichler, P., Lampin, E., and Zechner, C., Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. 810, C3.6 (2004)Google Scholar
4 Pawlak, B.J., Surdeanu, R., Colombeau, B., Smith, A.J., Cowern, N.E.B., Lindsay, R., Vandervorst, W., Brijs, B., Richard, B.O., and Cristiano, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2055 (2004)Google Scholar
5 Hamilton, J.J., Collart, E.J.H., Colombeau, B., Jeynes, C., Bersani, M., Giubertoni, D., Sharp, J.A., Cowern, N.E.B., and Kirkby, K.J., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Res. B 237, 107 (2005).Google Scholar
6 Hamilton, J.J., Collart, E.J.H., Colombeau, B., Bersani, M., Giubertoni, D., Sharp, J.A., Cowern, N.E.B., and Kirkby, K.J., Mat. Sci. Eng. B 124–125, 215 (2005).Google Scholar
7 Bersani, M., Giubertoni, D., Iacob, E., Barozzi, M., Pederzoli, S., Vanzetti, L. and Anderle, M., to be published in the Proceedings of: SIMS XV - 15th International Conference on Seconday Ion Mass Spectrometry, 12-16 September 2005, Manchester UK, special issue of Applied Surface Science.Google Scholar