Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:55:42.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Charge-balancing Species on Sm3+ Incorporation in Calcium Vanadinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2015

M. R. Gilbert*
Affiliation:
AWE, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Apatites are often seen as good potential candidates for the immobilization of halide-rich wastes. In particular, phosphate apatites have received much attention in recent years, however, their synthesis often produces complicated multi-phase systems, with a number of secondary phases forming [1.2]. Calcium vanadinite (Ca5(VO4)3Cl) demonstrates a much simpler phase system, with only a single Ca2V2O7 secondary phase which can easily be retarded by the addition of excess CaCl2. However, when doping with SmCl3 (as an inactive analogue for AnCl3) the Sm forms a wakefieldite (SmVO4) phase rather than being immobilized within the vanadinite, a result of having to form an energetically unfavourable Ca vacancy in order for the lattice to remain neutral overall. It has been postulated that charge-balancing the lattice via co-substitution of a monovalent cation will be less disfavoured and therefore help stabilise formation of a (Ca5-2xSmxAx)(VO4)3Cl solid solution (A = monovalent cation). This has been investigated using a combined modelling and experimental approach. Static lattice calculations performed using Li+, Na+ and K+ as charge-balancing species have shown the energy cost to be less than half that of charge-balancing via formation of a Ca vacancy. As a result, solid state synthesis of (Ca5-2xSmxLix)(VO4)3Cl, (Ca5−2xSmxNax)(VO4)3Cl and (Ca5-2xSmxKx)(VO4)3Cl solid solutions have been trialled, and analysis of the resulting products has shown a significant reduction in both the SmVO4 and Ca2V2O7 secondary phases across all dopant levels.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fong, S. K., Donald, I. W., Metcalfe, B. L., J. Alloys Comp., 444/445, 424 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, B. L., Donald, I. W., Fong, S. K., Gerrard, L. A., Strachan, D. M., Scheele, R. D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 985, 157 (2007).Google Scholar
Audubert, F., Carpena, J., Lacout, J. L., Tetard, F., Solid Sate Ionics, 95, 113 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stennett, M. C., Pinnock, I. J., Hyatt, N. C., J. Nucl. Mater., 414, 352 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreidler, H., Am. Mineral., 55, 180 (1970).Google Scholar
Beck, H. P., Douiheche, M., Haberkorn, R., Kohlmann, H., Solid State Sci., 8, 64 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1665, 319, (2014).Google Scholar
Rietveld, H. M., Acta Cryst., 22, 151 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar