Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:08:34.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Humidity on Dielectric Charging Process in Electrostatic Capacitive RF MEMS Switches Based on Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy Surface Potential Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Usama Zaghloul
Affiliation:
uzheiba@laas.fr, LAAS/CNRS, Université de Toulouse, MINC, Toulouse, France
George J. Papaioannou
Affiliation:
gpapaioan@phys.uoa.gr, University of Athens, Solid State Physics, Athens, Greece
Fabio Coccetti
Affiliation:
fcoccett@laas.fr, LAAS/CNRS, Novamems, Toulouse, France
Patrick Pons
Affiliation:
ppons@laas.fr, LAAS/CNRS, MINC, M2D, Toulouse, France
Robert Plana
Affiliation:
plana@laas.fr, LAAS/CNRS, Université de Toulouse, MINC, UPS, Toulouse, France
Get access

Abstract

In this article we investigate the effect of relative humidity on dielectric charging/discharging processes in electrostatically actuated MEMS devices. The assessment procedure is based on surface potential measurements using Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy (KPFM) and it targets in this specific work PECVD silicon nitride films in view of application in electrostatic capacitive RF MEMS switches. Charges have been injected through the AFM tip and the induced surface potential has been measured under different relative humidity levels. The impact of the charge injection duration and the bias level as well as bias polarity applied during the charge injection step, have been explored. Finally, the effect of the dielectric film thickness under different relative humidity levels has been assessed through depositing SiN films with different thicknesses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Peng, Z. et al. , IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letter, 19, no 5, pp. 299301 (2009).Google Scholar
[2] Peng, Z. et al. , Proc. Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, pp. 15351539, (2006).Google Scholar
[3] Lamhamdi, L. et al. , the 14th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Lyon, France, pp 579582, (2007).Google Scholar
[4] Herfst, R. W. et al. , the 46th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium, Phoenix, pp. 492495, (2008).Google Scholar
[5] Belarni, A. et al. , Journal of Microelectronics Reliability 48, pp. 12321236, (2008).Google Scholar
[6] Zaghloul, U. et al. , MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, DOI: 10.1557/PROC-1139-GG03-37, (2008).Google Scholar
[7] Zaghloul, U. et al. , the 15th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators, and Microsystems, (Transducers) Denver, pp. 789793, (2009).Google Scholar
[8] Ono, S. Takeuchi, M. and Takahashi, T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1086, (2001).Google Scholar
[9] Jacobs, H. O. Knapp, H. F. Stemmer, A. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, pp. 17561760, (1999).Google Scholar
[10] Sugimura, H. Ishida, Y. Hayashi, K. Takai, O. and Nakagiri, N. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1459, (2002).Google Scholar
[11] Sessler, G.M. (Ed.), Electrets, “Springer topics in applied physics”, vol. 33, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2nd ed., (1987).Google Scholar
[12] Knapp, H.F. Stemmer, A. Surf Interface Anal 27 (5-6): 324331, (1999).Google Scholar
[13] Ohara, K. and Cho, Y. J. Appl. Phys. 96, 7460, (2004).Google Scholar
[14] Nieuwesteeg, K. J. B. M. et al. , J. Appl. Phys., 71, pp. 12901297, (1992).Google Scholar
[15] Zaghloul, U. et al. , Journal of Microelectronics Reliability, 49, pp. 1309–131 (2009).Google Scholar