Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:14:38.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Biaxial Stress on the Ferroelectric Characteristics of PZT Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Joseph F. Shepard Jr*
Affiliation:
Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Susan Trolier-McKinstry
Affiliation:
Intercollege Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Mary Hendrickson
Affiliation:
Advanced MicroDevices Branch, Army Research Laboratory, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, 07703
Robert Zeto
Affiliation:
Advanced MicroDevices Branch, Army Research Laboratory, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, 07703
Get access

Abstract

The design and implementation of microelectromechanical (MEMS) systems requires a sound understanding of the influence of film stress on both the ferroelectric and piezoelectric characteristics of thin films to be used for sensing and/or actuation. Experiments were conducted in which thin film samples of sol-gel derived PZT were subjected to applied biaxial stresses from -139 to 142 MPa. Films were characterized at known stress states (derived from known values of residual stress and large deflection plate theory) in terms of their ferroelectric polarization (saturated and remnant), dielectric constants, coercive field strengths, and tan δ. Results obtained indicate that domain wall motion in thin films contributes much less to the observed response than is typical for bulk PZT materials. Alternative mechanisms are proposed in an attempt to explain the discrepancies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thorton, J. A. and Hoffman, D. W., Thin Solid Films 171, p. 531 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Tuttle, B. A., Voigt, J. A., Garino, T. J., Goodnow, D. C., Schwartz, R. W., Lamppa, D. L., Headley, T. J., Eatough, M. O., Proceedings of 8th International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics, 1992.Google Scholar
3. Shepard, J., Trolier-McKinstry, S., Hendrickson, M., Zeto, R., to be published in, Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1996.Google Scholar
4. Demartin, M. and Damjanovic, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, p. 30463048 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Budd, K. D., Dey, S. K., Payne, D. A., Electrical Ceramics, British Ceramic Proceedings 36, p. 107121 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Tani, T. and Payne, D. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, p. 12421248 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Jaccodine, R. J. and Schlegel, W. A., J. Appl. Phys. 37, p. 24292434 (1966).Google Scholar
8. Garino, T. J. and Harrington, M., Ferroelectric Thin Films II, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 243, Kingon, A. I., Meyers, E. R., and Tuttle, B., Eds. Pittsburgh: Materials Research Society, p. 341347 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Roark, R. J., Formulas for Stress and Strain. McGraw-Hill, 1989.Google Scholar
10. Brown, R. F., Can. J. Phys. 39, p. 741753 (1961).Google Scholar
11. Brown, R. F. and McMahon, G. W., Can. J. Phys. 40, p. 672674 (1962).Google Scholar
12. Buessem, W. R., Cross, L. E., Goswami, A. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 49, p. 3639 (1966).Google Scholar
13. Jaffe, B., Cook, W. R., Jaffe, H., Piezoelectric Ceramics. R.A.N. Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar