Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:41:45.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Surface Termination on CuIn1−XGaXSe2 Prepared from Mixed Cu-In-Ga-Se Precursors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Markus E. Beck
Affiliation:
Global Solar Energy, 5575 South Houghton Road, Tucson, AZ 85747, U.S.A
Jeff Alleman
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A
Amy Swartzlander-Guest
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A
Rick Matson
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A
Rommel Noufi
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Thin film CuIn(Ga)Se2 samples were prepared by a two-stage method starting from amorphous or nano-crystalline precursor structures. Deposition of individual Cu+Se and In+Se layers as a function of substrate temperature revealed the onset of detectable crystal structures at Tsub = 100°C and Tsub. ≥200°C, respectively. For the quaternary system the formation of CuInSe2 was observed at 400°C and evidence was found for liquid CuxSe assisted growth.

Further focus was on surface termination schemes with the objective to enhance the opencircuit voltage. Ga+Se, In+Se, Ga+Se/In+Se, and In+Se/Ga+Se terminating layers with varying amounts of Ga and In are addressed. Schemes studied to date have resulted in an increase in Voc at the expense of short-circuit current. The use of Ga containing termination layers resulted in the formation of large voids in the CIGS which could be explained by the volume changes during formation of the quaternary material and a Cu2Se free surface in these instances.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Beck, M. E., Swartzlander-Guest, A., Matson, R., Keane, J., and Noufi, R., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 64, 135165 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Schwartz, R. J. and Gray, J. L., Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. 21, 570574 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Schock, H. W., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 34, 1926 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Tuttle, J. R., Ruth, M., Albin, D., Mason, A., and Noufi, R., Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. 20, 15251530 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Tuttle, J. R., Contreras, M., Tennant, A., Albin, D., and Noufi, R., Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. 23, 415420 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Dhingra, A. and Rothwarf, A., Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. 23, 475480 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Schwartz, R. J., Gray, J. L., and Lee, Y. J., Conf. Rec. IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. 22, 920923 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Gabor, A. M., The Conversion of (In,Ga)2Se3 Thin Films to Cu(In,Ga)Se2 for Application to Photovoltaic Solar Cells, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Denver, CO (1995).Google Scholar
9. Contreras, M., Egaas, B., Ramanathan, K., Hiltner, J., Hasoon, F., and Noufi, R., Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 7, 311316 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Wolf, D. and Müller, G., Thin Solid Films 361–362, 155160 (2000).Google Scholar
11. Tuttle, J. R., Contreras, M., Bode, M. H., Niles, D., Albin, D. S., Matson, R., Gabor, A. M., Tennant, A., Duda, A., and Noufi, R., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 153161 (1995).Google Scholar