Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:10:05.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Technical Adsorbents and Cleaning Agents in a Cement Matrix – A Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Mårten Dario
Affiliation:
Dept of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping Univ., SE–581 83 Linköping, SWEDEN
Mireia Molera
Affiliation:
Dept of Chem./Nuclear Chem., Royal Inst. of Technology, SE–100 44 Stockholm, SWEDEN
Bert Allard
Affiliation:
MTM Research Centre, Örebro Univ., SE–701 82 Örebro, SWEDEN
Get access

Abstract

The effects of organic cleaning agents (totally three) and degradation products from solid technical adsorbents (two) on the sorption of Eu on cement and TiO2 were measured with variation of concentration (0.001–10 % of the water phase for the cleaning agents, alkaline degradation products corresponding to 0.03–8 mM DOC for the adsorbents) and reaction time (up to 420 d). The effects of the cleaning agents Industrikombi and Prefect Citron were minor. The degradation of the ion exchanger (metaacrylic polymer) had no significant effect on the Eu-sorption. The other adsorbent (filter aid, inert fibre; acrylonitrile polymer) was rapidly degrading at high pH, and the degradation products had a significant reducing effect on the sorption of Eu at added DOC-levels in the mM-range. This category of adsorbent materials should not be incorporated in a cement waste matrix or be stored in a cementitious environment together with radionuclides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. van Loon, L.R. and Glaus, M.A., Report PSI Bericht Nr. 98–07, 1998.Google Scholar
2. Pavasars, I., Ph.D. dissertation, Linköping university, 1999.Google Scholar
3. Sahai, N. and Sverjensky, D.A., Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta 61, 2801 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Bangun, J. and Adesina, A.A., Applied Catalysis A: General 175, 221 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Kosanic, M.M., Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 119, 119 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Ledin, A., Karlsson, S., and Allard, B., Applied Geochemistry 8, 409 (1993).Google Scholar