Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:51:06.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhancing Materials Research Through Innovative 3D Environments and Interactive Manuals for Data Visualization and Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2012

Claudia Flores ,
Teenie Matlock  and
Lilian P. Dávila
Claudia Flores
Affiliation:
Cognitive and Information Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts
Teenie Matlock
Affiliation:
Cognitive and Information Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts
Lilian P. Dávila*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering University of California Merced, 5200 N. Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, U.S.A.
*
*Corresponding Author. E-mail: ldavila@ucmerced.edu
Get access

Abstract

Spatial intelligence plays an important role in the success of nanoscience students specific to their visual ability to perceive structures in three dimensions. The NSF-funded IDEAS project makes use of a unique interactive 3D visualization system, based on immersive environment technology, for research and learning in Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) at UC Merced. In order to determine the effectiveness of the immersive system on nanoscience learning, a pilot project was conducted with undergraduate students, which showed the success of immersive systems in the science learning process. Overall, the immersive environment provided complete control in the construction and analysis of carbon-based nanostructure models. Results also showed the 3D visualization system benefited students with low spatial abilities. To facilitate a better understanding of the structure and properties of nanostructures, the IDEAS project has recently been expanded to allow accelerated simulations for materials research. It is important to integrate these new applications into undergraduate level courses in order to strengthen materials science education, recruit and retain future students, and to adapt modern technologies for future materials science educators. The expansion of the IDEAS project relies on the flexibility of this system to serve as a research tool as well as an innovative resource for science education. To adapt the 3D visualization and computing system and help engage students early in engineering research, our research group gathered practical technical documentation geared towards education of science users, based on both Cognitive Science and MSE Education (MSE-Ed) research. The work presented here involves developing educational resources through the design of audio-visual manuals for effective nanoscience learning. The manuals are being created using commercial software to produce interactive electronic books (ebooks). During the planning of the audio-visual manuals, we discovered that it is imperative to provide adequate educational tools as well as efficient guiding principles for the large number of visual, inductive, and active learners in general engineering education. This interdisciplinary project combines fundamental concepts from materials science and cognitive science, particularly project-based learning and active processing, while considering the concepts of overloading, and the unreliability of natural language, among other topics. This investigation will serve society by enhancing materials science research and education, as well as influencing engineering, chemistry, computer science and cognitive science fields, among others.

Keywords

simulationstructuraleducation
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1472: Symposium ZZ – Transforming Education in Materials Science and Engineering , 2012 , mrss12-1472-zz01-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thornton, K., Nola, S., Garcia, R.E, Asta, M., and Olson, G.B., J. of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 61 (10), 12–17 (2009).10.1007/s11837-009-0142-3Google Scholar
2. NanoHUB, Online simulation and more for nanotechnology. February 15, 2012 from http://nanohub.org/resources/teachingmaterials/ Google Scholar
3. Micro Worlds project, Berkeley National Laboratory. April 5, 2012 from http://www.lbl.gov/MicroWorlds/ Google Scholar
4. National Nanotechnology Insfrastructure Network, Educational portal. April 1, 2012 from http://www.nnin.org/nnin_edu.html Google Scholar
5. F. Cadena, Implementing Innovative Visual Aids in Engineering Education. April 15, 2012 from http://spacegrant.nmsu.edu/NMSU/2002/cadena.pdf Google Scholar
6. Saeed, N., Yang, Y., and Sinnappan, S., Edu. Tech. and Soc. 12 (4), 98–109 (2009).Google Scholar
7. O. Kreylos, Low-cost VR 3D VR tutorial pages. June 15, 2009 from http://idav.ucdavis.edu/∼okreylos/ResDev/LowCostVR/index.html Google Scholar
8. Doblack, B.N., Flores, C., Matlock, T., and Davila, L.P., in The Emergence of Immersive Low-Cost 3D Virtual Reality Environments for Interactive Learning in Materials Science and Engineering, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1320, Boston, MA, 2010) pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
9. Flemings, M.C. and Cahn, R.W., Acta Mater. 48(1), 371–383 (2000).10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00305-5Google Scholar
10. Mayer, R.E., New Directions for Teaching and Learning 89(1), 55–71 (2002).10.1002/tl.47Google Scholar
11. Reif, F., in Applying Cognitive Science to Education: Thinking and Learning in Scientific and Other Complex Domains, edited by Stone, T. (MIT Press, MA, USA, 2008), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
12. Baruh, H., A Need for Change in Engineering Education. April 20, 2012 from http://coewww.rutgers.edu/∼baruh/publications.html Google Scholar
13. Kolb, A.Y. and Kolb, D.A., in The Kolb Learning Style Inventory-Version 3: 2005 Technical Specifications, edited by TRG Hay (McBer, Boston, 2005), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
14. Felder, R.M. and Silverman, L.K., Eng. Ed. 78(7), 674–681 (1988); R.M. Felder and R. Brent, J. of Engineering Education 94 (1), 57-72 (2005).Google Scholar
15. Brown, E. and Pulske, J., in Student Engagement, edited by The University of Western Australia (Proc. 16th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Perth, Australia, 2007) pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
16. Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C., Khooshabeh, P., and Montello, D.R., Cognit. Sci. 32(1), 1099–1132 (2008).10.1080/03640210801898177Google Scholar
17. Doolittle, P.E.. May 1, 2010 from http://scr.csc.noctrl.edu/courses/edn509/resources/readings/multimediaLearningEmpericalResults.pdf Google Scholar
18. Baddeley, A.D., in Essentials of Human Memory, (Psychology Press, England, 1999), pp. 43–86.10.4324/9780203345160Google Scholar
19. Sweller, J., in Instructional Design in Technical Areas, (ACER Press, Australia, 1999), pp. 112–143.Google Scholar
20. Ramadas, J.E., International Journal of Science Education 31(1) 301–318 (2009).10.1080/09500690802595763Google Scholar
21. Mathewson, J.H., Science Education 83(1), 33–54 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z3.0.CO;2-Z>Google Scholar
22. Huk, T., J. of Computer Assisted Learning 22(6), 392–404 (2006).10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00180.xGoogle Scholar
23. Brown, A., Appelman, B., Green, T., and Hansen, L., in Computer Technology Courses for Pre-Service Teachers: a Comparison of Four University’s Approaches, edited by Willis, D. et al. ., (Proc. of the Soc. for Info. Tech. and Teach. Ed., Chesapeake, VA, USA, 2000) pp. 1225–1231.Google Scholar
24. Horton, W.K., in Designing and Writing Online Documentation: Help Files to Hypertext, edited by Hudson, T. and Hayden, M. (John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1990), pp. 354–364.Google Scholar
25. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C., in Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, edited by Hirsch, M. (Pearson Higher Education, Boston, 2009), pp. 478–508.Google Scholar
26. Hunter, M.C., in Teach More – Faster!: A Programmed Book, (TIP Publications, El Segundo, CA, USA, 1980), pp. 50–55.Google Scholar
27. Carroll, J.M., in The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990), pp. 5–30.Google Scholar