Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:50:11.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESCA Investigation of the Reaction Products Formed on Titanium Exposed to Water Saturated Bentonite Clay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Håkan Mattsson
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Metals, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg SWEDEN
Ingemar Olefjord
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Metals, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg SWEDEN
Get access

Abstract

Titanium is one of the materials proposed in the Swedish programme for the final containment of spent nuclear fuel. In the present investigation, the final repository environment was simulated on the laboratory scale by embedding titanium and a Ti-Pd alloy in dense, water-saturated bentonite clay. The temperature was 95°C and the exposures lasted between 4 months and 2 years. Analysis was performed using ESCA combined with ion etching.

The reaction products formed on the surface consists of TiO2 Montmorillonite - the main constituent of bentonite - is incorporated in the oxide. Suboxides exist near the oxide/metal interface.

The oxide thickness is in the range 70–100 Å. The oxide growth between 4 months and 2 years is small. No significant influence of Pd could be noted. If it is assumed, that the oxide growth follows a logarithmic law, the expression giving the thickest oxide is y = 5.5 In t (where y is the oxide thickness (Å) and t is the exposure time (s)).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. KBS Technical Report 31, Stockholm, 1977.Google Scholar
2. Molecke, M.A. et al., Sandia Report SAND82−0429, Sandia National Laboratories, N.M., December 1982.Google Scholar
3. Ruppen, J.A. et al., in Titanium for Energy and Industrial Applications, edited by Eylon, D. (The Metallurgical Society of American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1981) pp. 355369.Google Scholar
4. Olefjord, I. and Mattsson, H., in Scientific Basis for Radioactive Waste Management V, edited by Lutze, W. (Elsevier Science Publishing Co, 1982) p. 669 Google Scholar
5. Allard, B. and Ball, G.W., J. Environ. Sci. Health, 14, 511 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Olier, R. et al., J. Less-Common Met. 69, 73 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hofmann, S. and Sanz, J.M., J. Trace and Microprobe Techn. 1, 213 (1982/3).Google Scholar
8. Wehner, G.K., in Methods of Surface Analysis, edited by Czanderna, A.W. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1975) p. 5.Google Scholar
9. Levin, E.M. et al., Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, edited by Reser, M.K. (The American Ceramic Society, Columbus, Ohio, 1964) p. 41.Google Scholar
10. Henriksson, S. and de Pourbaix, M., KBS Technical Report 79−14, (Stockholm, 1979).Google Scholar
11. Mattsson, H. and Olefjord, I., KBS Technical Report 84−19, (Stockholm, 1984).Google Scholar
12. KBS Annual Report 1980, KBS Technical Report 80−26, Stockholm, 1981.Google Scholar