Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:41:01.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Nanotechnology Masters Recognition Scheme - Supporting Technical Higher Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Kshitij Aditeya Singh
Kshitij Aditeya Singh*
Affiliation:
kshitij.singh@nano.org.uk, Institute of Nanotechnology, Not Applicable, Lord Hope Building,, 141 St James Road,, Glasgow,, G4 0LT, UK, G4 0LT, United Kingdom, + 44 (0) 141 303 8444 Extension 310
Get access

Abstract

Europe aspires to become a knowledge oriented economy by 2010 in which nanoscience and nanotechnologies play an important role. However, the development of skills and competencies in the workforce will be critical in realising the benefits offered by nanoscience and nanotechnologies. The Nanotechnology Masters Recognition Scheme aims to support technical higher education by addressing the challenges of education in nanoscience and nanotechnologies particularly at the masters' level. The paper provides an overview of the education and professional development systems in Europe with specific examples from the U.K. The paper also underlines how the scheme addresses the challenges of skills and competencies development within the European context through information dissemination, identifying gaps and professional needs, encouraging professional development, and supporting through various different measures.

Keywords

educationgovernment policy and fundinggovernment interactions
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1105: Symposium OO – The Role of Lifelong Education in Nanoscience and Engineering , 2008 , 1105-OO04-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 European Commission Communication, “Education and Training 2010- Success of the Lisbon Strategy hinges on urgent reforms”, (COM (2003) 685), European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 11 November 2003.Google Scholar
2 European Commission Communication, “European Commission Communication Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology”. (COM (2004)338), European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 12 May 2004.Google Scholar
3 Malsch, I. and Oud, M., “Outcome of the Open Consultation on the European Strategy for Nanotechnology”, Nanoforum Publication, December 2004, http://www.nanoforum.orgGoogle Scholar
4 European Commission, “Consolidated version of the Treaty establishing the European Community”, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/12002E/htm/C_2002325EN.003301.htmlGoogle Scholar
5 European Commission, “The Bologna Declaration on the European Space for higher education”, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, June 1999 http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/bologna_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
6 Olley, Jessica, Ellis, Richard and Dowling, Paul, “A guide to Bologna Process,” UK Higher Education Europe Unit, London, UK, ISBN 1 84036 130 1, November 2006 Google Scholar
7 European Commission Communication, “The European Higher Education Area - Achieving the goals”, Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Bergen, Norway, May 2005, http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/00-Main_doc/050520_Bergen_Communique.pdfGoogle Scholar
8 European Commission, “European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS)”, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, July 2004, http://ec.europa.eu./education/programmes/socrates/ects/doc/ectskey_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
9 European Commission, “Realising the European Higher Education Area”. Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Berlin, Germany, September 2003, http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/00-Main_doc/030919Berlin_Communique.PDFGoogle Scholar
10 Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, “A European for qualifications of the European Higher Education Area”, Copenhagen, Denmark, ISBN 87-91469-53-8, February 2005.Google Scholar
11 Thune, Christian, “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in European Higher Education Area,” European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Helsinki, Finland, 2nd Edition, ISBN 952-5539-04-0, 2007 Google Scholar
12 EUR-ACE Project Board and European Commission, “Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes”, European Accreditation Project, November 2005, http://www.feani.org/EUR_ACE/reports_accrstand.htmGoogle Scholar
13 Education and Training Sub-group, Institute of Nanotechnology, “Education and Training Sub-group 2007 - 2008”, April 2007, http://www.nano.org.uk/nanomasters/PDFs/EducationTrainingSubgroup08.pdfGoogle Scholar
14 Monk, R., and Rachamim, A., “Research Training in Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies”, Proceedings of the workshop held in Brussels, 14-15 April 2005, European Commission, http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/src/educationworkshop.htmGoogle Scholar
15 Singh, K., “Nanotechnology Skills and Training Survey - Summary of Outcomes”, Nanoforum Publication, July 2007, http://www.nanoforum.orgGoogle Scholar
16 Singh, K., Dunn, S. and Morrison, M., “Nanotechnology Skills and Training Survey”, Institute of Nanotechnology Publication, Glasgow, U.K., September 2007.Google Scholar
17 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, “Recognition Scheme for Subject Benchmark Statement”, Gloucester UK, ISBN 1 85824 211 7, November, 2004.Google Scholar
18 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, “Subject Benchmark Statement - Chemistry”, Draft document for consultation, January 2007, http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/statements/drafts/Chemistrydraft07.pdfGoogle Scholar
19 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, “Subject Benchmark Statement - Engineering”, QAA Publication, Gloucester, U.K., ISBN 1 84482 526 4, 2006 Google Scholar
20 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, “Subject Benchmark Statement - Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics”, Mansfield, U.K., ISBN 978 1 84482 805 0, March, 2008 Google Scholar
21 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, “Subject Benchmark Statement - Pharmacy”, Gloucester, U.K., ISBN 1 85824 643 1, March, 2002 Google Scholar
22 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, “Masters degree in Business Administration”, Mansfield, U.K., ISBN 978 1 84482 660 5, 2007 Google Scholar
23 Engineering Council UK, “EUR-ACE/ENAEE”, April 2007, http://www.engc.org.uk/international/eurace.aspxGoogle Scholar
24 European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education, “ENAEE documents”, April 2007, http://www.enaee.eu/?prm=enaeedocGoogle Scholar
25 Engineering Council United Kingdom, “Regulations for Registration”, June 2006, http://www.engc.org.uk/documents/Regulations_for_Registration.pdfGoogle Scholar
26 European Federation of National Engineering Association, “EUR-ING Register”, April 2008, http://www.feani.org/Google Scholar
27 Science Council, “Chartered Scientists - The Standard for Professional Scientists”, London, U.K., April, 2008, http://www.sciencecouncil.org/index.phpGoogle Scholar
28 European Commission Communication, “Commission Recommendation on a code of conduct for responsible nanoscience and nanotechnologies research”, C (2008) 424 final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 7 February 2008.Google Scholar
29 Nanoscience Europe, “Virtual European Nanolab”, April 2007, http://www.nanoscience-europe.org/page.php?optim=Virtual-European-NanolabGoogle Scholar
30Prof. Marginson, Dr. Simon and Prof. Dr. Wende, Marijk van der, “Globalisation and Higher Education”, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, Education Working paper EDU/WKP(2007)3, July 2007.Google Scholar