Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:48:03.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extra Contribution of Tm Solutes to the Solute-Dislocation/Surface Interactions in Nickel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

T. Shinoda ,
K. Masuda-Jindo  and
Tomoo Suzuki
T. Shinoda
Affiliation:
Hitachi Research Lab., Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi, Ibaraki 317
K. Masuda-Jindo
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mater. Sci. & Enging., Tokyo Institute Tech., Yokohama 227
Tomoo Suzuki
Affiliation:
Dept. Metall. Enging., Tokyo Institute Tech., Tokyo 152, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The solute-dislocation (S-D) interaction energies for various kinds of transition-metal(TM) and B-subgroup solutes in nickel are calculated using a simple tight-binding electronic theory with lattice relaxations taken into account. As a result, the S-D interaction energy for TM solutes is almost identical with that for B-subgroup solutes when compared at an equal level of size-misfit strain( SMS) in Ni. This is neither more nor less than the answer from the classical elastic theory. However, in the solutions of the present calculation there are some points which can not be derived from the continuum elastic theory. Experiments show that Ni3Al is, differently from Ni, more strengthened by TM solutes than by B-subgroup ones. It is discussed that this may be due to the extra contribution of TM solutes to the S-D interaction energy in Ni3Al. As another possibility that TM solutes may contribute differently from B-subgroup ones to the macroscopic property of Ni, the (100) surface segregation of solute atoms in Ni is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 186: Symposium I – Alloy Phase Stability and Design , 1990 , 283
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1)Shinoda, T., Masuda-Jindo, K. and T, Suzuki, Phys. Rev. B 35 2155, (1987).Google Scholar
2)Mishima, Y., Ochiai, S., hamao, N., Yodogawa, M. and Suzuki, T., Trans. Japan. Inst. met. 27 656, (1986).Google Scholar
3)Mishima, Y., Ochiai, S., Hamao, N., Yodogawa, M. and Suzuki, T., Trans.Japan. Inst. met., 27 648, (1986).Google Scholar
4)Huang, C., Chang, K.M. and Taub, A.I., General Electric Tech. Information Series No. 85CRD178, (1985)(Unpublished).Google Scholar
5)Choi, G., Doctral Thesis Tokyo Institute Tech., (1990) (Unpublished).Google Scholar
6)Verlet, L., Phys. Rev. 159 98, (1967).Google Scholar
7)Shinoda, T., Masuda-Jindo, K. and Suzuki, T., Phil.Mag.B, 61(1990) in press.Google Scholar
8)Mishima, Y., Ooya, Y. and Suzuki, T., Acta Metall. 32 1161, (1985).Google Scholar
9)Abraham, F.F., Tsai, N-H. and Pound, G.M., Surf. Sci. 83 406, (1979).Google Scholar
10)Jindo-Masuda, K., J.Phys.F; Met.Phys. 13 1409, (1983).Google Scholar