Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T13:39:22.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication and Characterization of Pzt Thin-Film on Bulk Micromachined Si Motion Detectors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T.J. Garino
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, MS-141 1, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411
B.A. Tuttle
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, MS-141 1, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411
G. Laguna
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, MS-141 1, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411
P. Clem
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, MS-141 1, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411
Get access

Abstract

Motion detectors consisting of Pb(ZrxTi(1−x))O3 (PZT) thin films, between platinum electrodes, on micromachined silicon compound clamped-clamped or cantilever beam structures were fabricated using either hot KOH or High Aspect Ratio Silicon Etching (HARSE) to micromnachine the silicon. The beams were designed such that a thicker region served as a test mass that produced stress at the top of the membrane springs that supported it when the object to which the detector was mounted moved. The PZT film devices were placed on these membranes to generate a charge, or a voltage, in response to the stress through the piezoelectric effect. Issues of integration of the PZT device fabrication process with the two etching processes are discussed. The effects of PZT composition and device geometry on the response of the detectors to motion is reported and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Spineanu, A., Benabes, P., and Kielbasa, R., Sensors and Actuators A 60, 127–33 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Laguna, G., private communication.Google Scholar
3. Schwartz, R.W., Bunker, B., Dimos, D., Assink, R., Tuttle, B., and Weinstock, I., Int. Ferroelectrics 2, 243–45 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Lang, W., Materials Science and Engineering, R: Biomimetic Materials, Sensors and Systems R17, p. 155 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Bao, M., Burrer, C., Esteve, J., Bausells, J. and Marco, S., Sensors and Actuators A. 37–38, p. 727732 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Zhang, Q., Liu, L. and Li, Z., Sensors and Actuators A 56, p. 251–4 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Shul, R. J., Willison, C.G., and Zhang, L., SPIE 3511, 252 (1998).Google Scholar
8. Ayon, A. A., Lin, C. C., Braff, R. A., Schmidt, M. A., Bayt, R., and Sawin, H. H., Solid-State Sensor andActuator Workshop, 41 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Luginbuhl, P., Racine, G., Lerch, P., Romanowicz, B., Brooks, K. G., Rooij, N. de, Renaud, P. and Setter, N., Sensors and Actuators A 54, p. 530–5 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Nemirovsky, Y., Nemirovsky, A., Muralt, P. and Setter, N., Sensors and Actuators A 56, p. 239–49 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Lee, C., Itoh, T., Sasaki, G and Suga, T., Materials Chemistry and Physics 44, p. 25–9 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Watanabe, S. and Fuji, T., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, p. 38983903 (1996).Google Scholar