Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:30:36.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication of Ionic Polymer Metal Composite Actuator with Palladium Electrodes and Evaluation of its Bending Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Takuma Kobayashi
Affiliation:
happyswing0122@yahoo.co.jp, Keio University, Mechanical Engineering, Yokohama, Japan
Takeshi Kuribayashi
Affiliation:
dolphin_220@a2.keio.jp, Keio University, Mechanical Engineering, Yokohama, Japan
Masaki Omiya
Affiliation:
oomiya@mech.keio.ac.jp, Keio University, Mechanical Engineering, Yokohama, Japan
Get access

Abstract

We built up the way of fabricating IPMC actuator with palladium electrodes and we found that it showed large bending response than Au-plated IPMC actuator. An ionic polymer-metal composite (IPMC) consisting of a thin perfuorinated ionomer membrane, electrodes plated on both faces, undergoes large bending motion when a small electric field is applied across its thickness in a hydrated state. The characteristics of IPMC are ease of miniaturization, low density, and mechanical flexibility. Therefore, it is considered to have a wide range of applications from MEMS sensor to artificial muscle. However, there are problems on IPMC. First, its mechanical and electric characteristics have not been clarified because of the complex mechanism of the deformation. Second, it is high-priced because most of IPMC actuators use gold or platinum as electrodes. In order for IPMC actuator to be widely put to practical use, we should solve these problems. Hence, this research focuses on fabrication of IPMC actuator with palladium electrode, which is cheaper than gold or platinum, and evaluation of its mechanical properties such as its tip displacement. We fabricated IPMC consisting of a thin Nafion® membrane, which is the film with fluorocarbon back-bones and mobile cations, sandwiched between two thin palladium plates. The surface resistivity was 2.88±0.18Ω/sq., so it could be said to be enough small. Then, we observed its cross section by using FE-SEM. As a result, palladium plates were evenly coated and its thickness was about 30μm. Also, we carried out an actuation test for two kinds of IPMCs: one was fabricated by using Nafion®117 (thickness 183μm), the other was by Nafion®115 (thickness 127μm). In this test, the relationship between voltage (0˜4V) across its thickness and tip displacement for the cantilevered strip of the IPMC was measured. Then we found that IPMCs showed large bending motion under a low electric field. When Nafion®117 sample was subjected to voltage of 1.5V, the ratio of the tip displacement to the sample length was 0.35, which was lager bending than Au-plated IPMC actuator, whose ratio of the tip displacement to the sample length was 0.12 [1]. When Nafion®115 sample was applied to 1.5V, the ratio of the tip displacement to the sample length was 0.22. Then, we found that Nafion®117 bended in a larger way than Nafion®115. Reference [1]Sia Nemat-Nesser and Yongxian Wu,”Comparative experimental study of ionic polymer-metal composites with different backbone ionomers and in various cation forms”, Journal of Applied Physics,93,5255 (2003)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, Sherrit, Stewart and Lih, Shyh-Shiuh “Characterization of the Electromechanical Properties of EAP materials”, Proceedings of EAPAD, SPIE's 8th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport, CA. Paper No. 4329–43 (2001)Google Scholar
2 Nemat-Nesser, Sia and Wu, Yongxian, “Comparative experimental study of ionic polymer–metal composites with different backbone ionomers and in various cation forms”, Journal of Applied Physics, 93, 5255 (2003)10.1063/1.1563300Google Scholar
3 Nemat-Nasser, S. and Li, J. YuElectrochemical response of ionic polymer-metal composites”, Journal of Applied Physics, 87 (2000)10.1063/1.372343Google Scholar
4 Kim, K.J., Yim, W., Paquette, J.W., and Kim, D., “Ionic Polymer-metal Composites for Underwater Operation”, Journal of Intelligent Materials System and Structures (JIMSS), (2006, in print)Google Scholar
5 Paquette, J.W., Kim, K.J., “Ionmeric Electro-Active Polymer Artificial Muscle for Naval Applications”, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering (JOE), Vol.29, No.3, pp.729737 (2004)10.1109/JOE.2004.833132Google Scholar
6 Bennett, M.D. and Leo, D.J., “Ionic Liquids as Solvents for Ionic Polymer Transducers, Sensors and Actuators A”: Physical, Vol. 115. pp. 7990 (2004)Google Scholar